 |
|
Brent
|
|
Star Wars needs a TBS. Maybe landbased for the history of Tatooine? Or spacebased beginning at the beginning of the Old Republic, with the Hutts as a civilization? I suppose you should be able to play as the Hutts. Beginning at the beginning of the Old Republic, what civilizations could there be in addition to the Republic and the Hutts? Could the Sith be a civ?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
pg
|
|
Panzer General 1 is my favorite TBS game with just a campaign. SMAC is all randomly generated so it's infinately replayable, which is why I rate it higher.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Standup
|
|
Tricky one this. Played PG1 loads but haven't for the last couple of years. Similar story with Civ2 - don't like Civ3 but i did get use to the graphics. I know i'm shallow but if for no other reason than my TFT doesn't cope with non native resolutions too well for that blocky effect.
So just to vary the voting a bit Imperialism 2 closely followed by MOO2 and HOMM3.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Brent
|
|
I also tried and disliked Star Wars Rebellion. I guess I wished it was a TBS. The most fun you can have with it is to start it and wait, and watch what happens when you lose.
I don't normally play FPS, but I do have Voyager Elite Force as one of the two games on my PS2. I don't bother with the FPS campaigns, I just do multiplayer.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dissident
I voted for SMAC because it had the most options (actually SMAX has the most options, but it seems unbalancing- just doesn't seem as fun as the original)
But I wonder if I should have voted for Civ2. Because I have played more civ2 than smac. But smac is still on my hard drive, civ2 isn't. Civ3 is the reason civ2 is not on my hard drive. I can't go back. |
I think its what you like most, played most, thought was best etc, not what youve still got on your hard drive.
For example I played Civ2 dozens of times, I think - playing many times on Deity level to see if i could win different ways, on different maps etc - and when i got tired of that i played scenarios, and the Civ:TOT fantasy and sci-fi games. But ive played it so much i have a hard time going back to it, even though there are some good scenarios ive never played.
SMAC on the other hand i played about 3 or 4 times before getting tired of it. OTOH I could very well see myself giving it a second chance, perhaps after Ive played several other TBS's.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pythagoras
|
 |
Charlottesville VA
Jan 1970 time: 00:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
You mean is philosophy background. Actually I think Civ2 showed that as well, but in Civ2 it was subtle, so subtle that most people dont see it till its pointed out, and even then some will deny it (see my column, Civ2's Hegelian Tech Tree) in SMAC, OTOH, the philosophy is "in your face", and rather heavy handed ("oh wow, I can research Will to Power")
That had a lot to do with why SMAC rubbed me the wrong way, I think. I fully understand that it was quite different for most everyone else. |
I agree, his History background is also shown well in Colonization.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|