 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:18
|
|
France - Scotland 16 - 9.
A poor match by the French. The first half saw the Scots lead by 6-0, in part thanks to 3 missed penalties. That first half was really bad, with a big pressure from the Scot back row, but several penalties gained by the French on the scrum (thank you Marconnet).
The second half was much better, when the French managed to launch Chabal a few times. Delaigue was good except for his 2 missed penalty kicks. I liked Ludovic Valbon, who entered as a winger early in the match. He made several good moves and looks very talented.
Still, the team desperately needs to fight more when they meet England next week.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:18
|
|
quote: Mignoni proved he is not an international level player (at least in my opinion) as he was not able to play quickly enough to unbalance the Scottish defence. |
The fact that the Scottish scrummy was really good didn't help him either. But it's probably mostly because his pack wasn't as aggressive as it should have been that Mignoni didn't do so well. Still he's got many things to prove if he wants to play at this level again.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:18
|
|
I thought the French second half was vastly superior to the first half but they still managed, somehow, not to score. Except from the charge down late in the match. Admittedly the Scots defence was solid. With so many first-choice players missing, it's hard to know how to rate the French performance apart from, overall, disappointing.
England -v- Wales? I thought Wales deserved to win and should have won by more. They wasted some golden try-scoring opportunities in the first half with some poor decision-making. The classic example was when they had 5 on 3 out wide, with only England forwards to beat - why were England forwards always to be found where the backs should be? - and the Welsh kicked instead of passed.
England? Well, they have injury problems, too, and I realise it's the first international of the season, but I thought there was a depressing lack of tactical nouse and strategy. Just as there was in the match against us at Twickers. In that match, when they drove through the forwards, they looked dangerous. Which they did, in that match, for about 10 minutes. Last night they probably did it once for about 30 seconds. For the rest of the match it was haphazard, fairly aimless rugby. The backline might as well not have turned up to play.
It didn't help that they only had one worthwhile forward in Ben Kay. He tried his hardest. But Grewcock is a waste of space. And dangerous. Tell me, Havak, is he psychotic? He should have been red carded for his boot to the head. He should also be cited. What can he claim in his defence? That he was aiming for the ball? The ball was on the ground. He escaped a boots charge earlier in the week. He pushed his luck too far last night. I also thought the Welsh captain's yellow card was ridiculous. There were no punches, he pushed with an open hand. Reverse the penalty for retaliation, certainly, but it didn't warrant a card.
The young Novacastrian centres barely got a sniff. Not necessarily their fault, because there didn't actually seem to be any plan to involve the backline. But young Tait will remember his debut for the couple of smashing tackles he copped from Henson. Gee, Henson can tackle. And play a bit, too.
Apart from that, the Beer Gut still can't throw into a lineout, and I still have to question whether Jason Robinson is the right man to captain. As against us, England looked leaderless on the field. Robinson is a wonderfully skilled player, and I'm sure he's a terrific person, but he doesn't impose himself. He doesn't take charge. He doesn't direct. And if the coach isn't up to it tactically - and, I have to say, the evidence is that he isn't - then the captain has to organise it on the field. I suspect that J**** is weeping into his glass of chardonnay in his chair in front of the TV. No one will fill his captaincy boots in a hurry because he will go down as one of the great leaders of all rugby time, but I'm sure Robinson isn't the man. On the other hand, out of the current team, including those currently injured, I don't know who is.
I don't know about Wales. They do one thing very well - run the ball, exploiting the speed and skills of that little winger. When they can't do that, they're terribly vulnerable. England, playing as as they were, I think, should never have hit the lead. Still, if the Welsh are as young a team as they seem, they have potential, and the win will give them great confidence. What they need, I suspect, is some muscle and sturdiness to back up the speed and skills.
Last edited by finbar on 06-02-2005 at 06:52
|
|
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:18
|
|
I agree with what you said on Wales-England.
quote: But young Tait will remember his debut for the couple of smashing tackles he copped from Henson. Gee, Henson can tackle. | Yeah, that tackle when he ended up on his feet with the poor English in his arms was really funny.
The Welsh would probably have scored has they passed the ball wide more often. Both Henson and Williams were a bit too individualist at times. Overall, the Welsh could have attacked a bit more even when they led, and not let the English come back the way they did. Said English had apparently no sense of how to attack. Even playing with two fly halves gave them an advantage for only about 5 minutes. Lewsey in particular has had a quite poor placement when receiving kicks.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Havak
Yeah I saw that Taffy fan story in the press here - wonder if it is true? Certainly shows the sanity of the average Welsh fan? |
Or shows the perils of gambling. 
quote: I take it you have checked out the BBC boards - one win by two points and the welsh fans are talking of a long term return to parity between England and the Celts. I think thats an impressively blinkered view of the reality of the difference between the countries myself - it's a hard period for us but it is likely to be finite. They are about as good as they will ever get - and I still maintain they were awful on Saturday too as any competnet side would have stuffed us the way we played. |
Objective opinion. I don't know that they're as good as they're going to get. They should have won by a lot more and need more than their current running game. Yes, any competent team would have beaten you. I'd say they're on the improve while you can only - and must - improve. You've got greater playing depth and a better set up, so you should, down the track, pay them back with interest. But, under this coach, it will probably take longer than it should. I know little about the man but he doesn't even look like a thinker!
quote: There is an argument for youth - though perhaps Tait is just a little too young. Wilko was already far physically stronger when he debuted at 17. Ollie Smith = 22, Henry Paul = approx 30. So where is the sense even on that level? Paul has failed at every asking - Tamerlin will remember Paris in 2002 when Paul bottled it. Why risk him against France again? |
Yes, Tait probably is too young, and too physically slight. Henson ate him. BTW, why haven't I seen Henson before? Obviously I have, but I haven't noticed him. He can play. The Paul situation is ridiculous. A nail in the coach's coffin.
quote: Grewcock has had disciplinary problems throughout his career. His record of cards is far worse than a certain retired locks for example. |
J**** was rough and tough. Grewcock, I think, has a screw loose. No one will convince me his boot was accidental. I've watched it many times. The trajectory of his boot had nothing to do with stepping over the ruck. If it did, his foot was going to land ten feet the other side of the ruck.
quote: The other two locks in the squad are not impressing me this season. I'd pull either of the two from the Friday A game instead to partner Kay - and yes you guessed it they are Brown and Deacon. |
Frankly, apart from Kay's game on the weekend, I haven't seen an England lock worth a pinch since J**** retired.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Havak
|
 |
Swing Low, Sweet Chariots.
Aug 1999 time: 05:18
|
|
quote: Or shows the perils of gambling. |
or the dangers of bravado not backed by intellect? 
quote: But, under this coach, it will probably take longer than it should. I know little about the man but he doesn't even look like a thinker! |
I think you have it right. Long term these youngsters are going to click for England – and sometime, some when a Celtic side will get a walloping again. Probably Wales at HQ next year.
He does worry me Robinson. Amazing blind spots.
quote: The Paul situation is ridiculous. A nail in the coach's coffin. |
Without full squad details yet to hand it looks like he has not been selected. Common sense may have prevailed.
*edit* No such thing. Paul makes the bench!!!
Is Robinson a total ******???
Paul on the bench – Smith wasted in an A game? Even Tait again was a better option. 
You haven’t seen Henson because he is very new to the setup. He figured in the autumn but Saturday was his first six nations game. He is 23 and this last year has improved immeasurably. His victim Tait turned 19 on Sunday – I bet that was a happy birthday!
quote: The trajectory of his boot had nothing to do with stepping over the ruck. If it did, his foot was going to land ten feet the other side of the ruck. |
Having seen his club game disciplinary record after the Dallaglio stamping incident I cannot argue with you. It’s a poor record.
quote: Frankly, apart from Kay's game on the weekend, I haven't seen an England lock worth a pinch since J**** retired. |
I am not arguing with you here - simply because you haven't seen the best we have now. I complained last year when the combination became Grewcock-Borthwick with an out of form Kay as backup (and he now looks to be back to form thank goodness). The Bath combination has never impressed me, Tigers bias aside. Shaw was injured and has never really got back after the summer tour then killed his career (and injured him again by the by). When Jonno retired I personally would have gone straight to the young uns from the A side I named earlier - with Kay mentoring. But that is clearly just me. 
Okay my thoughts on the squad. Great to see Corry fit. You saw his dislocation didn’t you Finbar? He should really add some go forward as indeed should Moody. Vickery for White is for injury – time for Phil to pretend it is five years ago. And Ellis for Dawson is sensible, as is Moody for Hazell. And the fact that Worseley shuffles to blindside kicking Jones out the 22 altogether makes my day.
The downs? Paul obviously. Isn’t six chances enough to know any answers? Noon at 13 – strange choice, particularly after the coach calls Smith “an explosive talent” on Monday and those words will never trouble Noon’s CV I suspect.
If England win it will be the old way – through route one. But our midfield is under huge threat from the French combo. Hmm – could be a case of who plays the worst on the day. After all France were worse against Scotland than we were against Wales – I dare Tamerlin to deny that! 
Oh yes and finally for Ravagon’s benefit Steve Walsh sucks as a ref – but for once is not responsible for England losing – that was all their own work. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Havak
|
 |
Swing Low, Sweet Chariots.
Aug 1999 time: 05:18
|
|
Having lost 7 from 10 tests I very much understand where you are coming from. Rebuilding is painful - and not helped by a coach who makes bizarre decisions such as Steve Thompson retaining his starting place.
The trouble is France have a settled side that on paper should be formidable - performances like NZ and Scotland simply should not come from them?
Good to see Guscott in his BBC column saying Smith should be there - at least it means I am not alone thinking he is a far better choice than Noon. Here is hoping Smithy gets a hat trick in the A fixture so Robinson cannot ignore him again.
Last edited by Havak on 10-02-2005 at 14:31
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|