 |
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:17
|
|
Well, it is an 'extended minor' for me. That's all I study, software engineering and mathematics. of course certain amount of mathematics is mandatory in software engineering, but I'm going further than mandatory, and I don't really have another subjects so I say SE and mathematics, that's it, all my courses are those.
Am I good at it? I'm not exceptionally good at it, but good enough. How well have I grasped.. I'd say pretty well. Not 100%, but let's say.. 90%. And of that 90% I still remember 40% . But I can get it back by just goign threw few pages and it all coems back to me. I just can't remember the rules of different craps, but if say for example mathematicians handbook is allowed material, then I have no problemo.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:17
|
|
The foundations: Vector Cal, Differential Equations, Linear Algebra, Discrete Math.
As far as real math (Linear Algebra and Discrete Math sorta straddle this boundary) goes:
Real, Complex, and Tensor Analysis, Algebra (groups primarily, rings to a lesser extent), Topology, and Differential Geometry.
Most of it's a haze. Particularly real analysis.
And yeah, I certainly plan on learning more.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drogue
|
 |
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002 time: 05:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by VetLegion
I think we can all agree that mathemathics is essential. If you want to be really good at what you do, you have to have a good grasp of mathemathics, even your area of expertize is economics or history.
If you are, say, a painter, you don't strictly need mathemathics for your work, but you'll need to know how to invest the money when you become rich, and it will be helpful then  |
But a artist who works for a commune, caring not about material things but his art, has little use for mathematics.
Yes, maths is massively important for many points in life, and basic maths is essential for everybody, but anything beyond the level of rudimentary maths is needed only by those who use it. And as talking to my maths students and tutors at university I become acutely aware of, anyone expecting to use degree level maths in a non-specifically maths based career will be disappointed. Thus if you mean maths at some level is essential, then I'd agree, however if you have to have high level maths to be really good at anything, I'd strongly disagree.
quote: Originally posted by VetLegion
1. What is the highest level of mathemathics you have so far studied? |
Depends what you consider higher. My degree is half maths, and is the highest I have any formal qualifications in, but I did higher level maths a couple of years ago at masterclasses for gifted maths students and the like, plus stuff I've learned from my brother.
quote: Originally posted by VetLegion
2. How well have you grasped what you were taught? |
Pretty well. Some of the conceptual stuff I could grasp but got lost on the maths, but that was working a few years ahead of where I am. Pretty much everything in my course I've grasped well.
quote: Originally posted by VetLegion
3. Are you going to learn more? |
Yep, doing economics you can't get away from it, and I'm taking at least 2, if not all 3 of the maths options for the next 2 years, as well as it being included a lot in my normal econ options.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:17
|
|
I studied intro Calc, which I've now all but forgotten. Hasn't hurt me one bit, and I can't imagine I'll ever need to know more math than I currently do. Certainly isn't going to hurt me career wise/financially.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lul Thyme
|
|
Quebec, Canada
Aug 2000 time: 05:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by -Jrabbit
IRL, personal budgeting and retirement planning is what's relevant for me. If I ever need "real" math done, my company has dozens of engineers for that... |
No mathematicians think that engineers do any real math...
Most engineers barely take any math besides some first year University calc like any economist or even manager, and then maybe a couple extra numerical methods...
I'm doing my Master's in math now, Algebraic Graph Theory to be specific, so did a bit of everything (mostly algebra, and discrete math, some analysis (maybe 4-5 courses), barely any topology or number theory).
I take almost only Algebra and Discrete Math now.
This semester took :
-Algebra 1 (masters level course, just goes to show, the name doesnt mean much, we did more groups, more ring, modules, tensors, etc)
-Combinatorial Enumeration (more advanced counting techniques...)
-Design Theory
Next semester taking
-Comb. Optimization
-Graph Theory
-Graph Automorphisms, as a reading course
The course I like best are usually the algebra ones.
The course I took I understood least was a diff. geometry one.
I guess its a mixture of not liking it, and not putting close to enough effort in it, didnt understand the start, and everything else depended on that, was lost and bored, and did horribly 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lul Thyme
|
|
Quebec, Canada
Aug 2000 time: 05:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Vlad Antlerkov
College freshman and probable math major checking in.
1) Currently studying multivariable calculus. Have previously studied single-variable calculus and taken a full-year course in combinatorics (that's basically counting large numbers of things), in addition to the customary algebra I/algebra II/geometry.
2) Fairly well (A- for the term).
3) Yes. Next year, I'm doing Intro to Analysis I/II, Linear Algebra, and Geometry. The Intro to Analysis course is the only thing that's certain right now; what I take depends on what gets offered and in which terms (and who teaches it). |
Good luck!
Analysis will be considered your first "real math" course.
Meaning you will get a glimpse of what mathematicians really do (no they do not calculate big multiplications, how often I here that one...).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drogue
|
 |
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002 time: 05:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lul Thyme
No mathematicians think that engineers do any real math...
Most engineers barely take any math besides some first year University calc like any economist or even manager, and then maybe a couple extra numerical methods... |
I'm not sure about the US, but I know some of the Engineer's I talk to do at least 2/3 of their degree as maths, and most economists would be between 1/3 and 2/3 maths, depending on which options you'd choose. The Cambridge engineering course does more maths than the maths degree at my local uni, and requires maths (and recommends further maths) A levels, which go beyond US College first year calc before you've even got to uni.
Indeed, my brother's PhD is in maths, but is actually done with the engineering department in part, and paid for by Rolls-Royce. Any engineering degree worth it's salt will include some 'real' maths, as do all the decent Economics degrees over here.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
civman2000
|
 |
of the Martian Empire
Jun 2001 time: 23:17
|
|
1. General topology, differential real analysis, and a little bit of modern algebra and geometry.
2. Very well
3. Yes. A lot more.
quote: Anyhow, to answer the questions seriously:
I've taken about 4 courses in analysis (real, complex and on metric spaces in general)
4 in modern algebra (theory of rings, groups, fields)
2 in differential equations (1 ordinary, 1 partial)
1 in differential geometry
2 in modern geometry/topology
It's difficult to say which of these involved the "highest" level of mathematical knowledge. They are all in different branches. All rely on lower math understanding (set theory, calculus etc.)
I grasped it well enough to pass and I remember it as well as could be expected.
I am very likely going to learn more. |
Ooh! I want to be you in a couple years! Except minus the differential equations and with a stronger understanding of everything!
Math is fun! Especially things involving the Axiom of Choice (I just was doing a homework problem involving ultrafilters (I had to show there was a 1-1 correspondence between the elements of teh Stone-Cech compactification of a discrete space and the set of ultrafilters over the space) and I had to show there was a unique ultrafilter with a certain property. What was interesting was that as soon as you can show there is at least one such ultrafilter (using the axiom of choice), you can completely specify what the elements of the unique ultrafilter are, but if you don't know one exists, you can't figure out what it is (well you can but the process of doing so is practically equivalent to proving that one exists).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ColdWizard
|
|
1. Calc II
2. Not at all.
3. **** no.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|