 |
|  |
 |
|
snoopy369

|
 |
Of the Peanuts Gallery
Apr 2004 time: 23:16
|
|
In a PBEM, naval combat or even naval maneuvers of any sort are very rare, much more so than in SP.
In this general thread, we should discuss why this is, if it's a problem, and if it is a problem, what we can or should do about it.
Reasons why:
- Pangea effect: Most PBEMs, to speed up contact and combat (not to mention the game), are played on Pangeas.
- Poor naval options pre-Industrial: The Frigate is the first combat ship, and it comes at the very end of the medieval era. Most PBEMs are nearly over or over by this point.
- Lack of amphibious options: If you're playing the Vikings, you're going to go naval. Anyone else, probably not. There's no incentive to attack from the water, unless it's to avoid land.
- Ships sink: Until Astronomy, you generally can't take ships out into the water anyway - and more so until Astronomy - unless you're seafaring or have the lighthouse, so it's unlikely to have naval combat pre-astronomy anyway.
Possibilities to fix:
1. Pangea effect - probably can't fix that, since it's a preference, except to make naval games more fun.
2. Naval options - Add one or more 'offensive' naval units, or strengthen current units. The problem here is that galleys/caravels are essentially warriors/spearmen on the water; there's no swordsman or even an archer until Magnetism ... but here we're adding units, which is a big change ...
3. Amphibious options - modify one or more earlier units to have the Amphibious flag. Possibly the Longbowman, which would exist roughly at the same time as astronomy, or even the Archer; or add an amhibious unit (more realistic, anyhow) at Astronomy, or earlier. Again, a big change.
4. Unless you move the sea travelling up, the only way to work this is to create a small wonder to function like the Great Lighthouse. Not necessarily a bad option...
These changes may or may not be appropriate for the "stock" PBEM mod, but might be worth looking into for a "Fun PBEM Mod" or something like that - one with more changes, not as many as RaR etc. but with some additions to enhance gameplay.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
punkbass2000
|
 |
Waterloo, ON, Canada
Feb 2002 time: 00:16
|
|
I wonder how necessary Maval combat is, even. IF people want a Pangaea, they probably are not going to do a lot of naval venturing. As R2D mentioned, there will be exploration boats, but what else do you really need? In short, why should there be more advantages/reasons to use a navy. In terms of fairly large, ocean-going boats, it really isn't useful unless you're playing a map which happens to have something comparable to the RW Mediterranean. Otherwise, I think its abstracted quite nicely. Most naval needs were sufficed by rivers, and this is represented by extra Commerce around rivers. It took competition, poor living conditions and host of other compelling iniitatives to get Europeans out of Europe. VOyages to the New World wouldn't come back for more than a year, if at all. Much like Galley's encourage, most naval exploration was only achived by staying near coast or making short naval jumps from one island to the next, like the Vikings. The Chinese discovered Africa simply because they followed the coast; they never found Australia, which was much closer. In fact, if anything, I would be inclined to restrict naval exploration in ways similar to the AU mod. I think you should at least need MM/Galleys to have a chance at crossing Ocean. May be with strict limits on naval units(Curraghs only on coast, ever, Galleys cannot enter Ocean) you could have early naval warships. They would need to be expensive, slow and vulnerable, IMO. Maybe 2/1/2 for 60 shields.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|