 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Giancarlo
There is no way BK is more libertarian then me. No way in hell. |
Why not?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VJ
|
 |
Helsinki
Dec 2001 time: 07:34
|
|
quote: This is a stupid question. That is an advantage of a one-party state, but it's not an advocation of one. |
I disagree, it's one of the few disadvantages of the one-party state. For example, take China under Mao and the Great Leap Forward. Do you think it would've happened if there would've been any lengthy arguments in the three branches of goverment (all directly under control of Mao then)?
Kucinich, very good points there.
Last edited by VJ on 07-01-2005 at 03:39
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kidicious
quote:
There is one big flaw in this. It demands that decisions made by a one-party state are the right ones, but history has proven well that that isn't the case - quite opposite. With democracy there are at least a chance to stop the worst mistakes. |
No. It assumes that neither one party systems or multiparty systems come to better decisions, but that one party systems make decisions with less delay. |
Disagree. Wether you are a onepartyjunkie or ekstremist democrat and don't want to lie, you has to agree to the statement which probably will make you something like a totalitarian marxist which doesn't make sense for the ekstremist democrat. Therefore the question must implicitly state that those desicions made by a one-party state also are the right.
edit : damn quotes.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|