 |
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:30
|
|
quote: WTF is this? This sounds an awefully lot like 'he was right' to me. |
It's called "motive", the reason someone has for acting a particular way. If I was justifying what he did, I would have said he was right to blow that building up. I merely explained why he did it because you can't fathom that Reagan's militarisation of law enforcement had negative consequences.
quote: Why don't we cut to the chase, Berz? |
You keep ducking my request for a quote to back up your slander.
quote: Do you approve of what McVeigh did in Oklahoma City? |
No, do you approve of what happened at Waco and Ruby Ridge?
quote: Do you approve of the IRA bombing campaign in England? |
No, do you approve of what the British have done to the Irish for centuries?
quote: Do you approve of suicide bombers in Israel? |
No, do you approve of Israelis murdering Arabs?
quote: Do you approve of AQ launching civilian airliners as missiles at New York? |
No, do you approve of US complicity in the slaughter of more than a million Muslims?
quote: When you justify it, you can be interpreted as approving of it. |
Where did I justify any of this? Use an actual quote and not something I said that "sounds like" I did.
quote: Of course there are reasons that each action happened. The point is/was is it right to take the fight to unarmed civies? |
Ah, so when you identify these links in the chain of cause and effect, you're not justifying murder. But when I do I am justifying murder?
quote: Do you want to understand the animals that take unjustifiable steps to fight an enemy by targeting civilians? |
If I need to learn more, I sure as hell won't ask you.
quote: How much better and worthy of understanding are they than the Son of Sam? |
Do you see why?
Last edited by Berzerker on 17-01-2005 at 16:43
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Berzerker
To your last question, yes to both. Brit sympathisers were often executed. But get off your ******* high horse long enough to quote me. |
Non-military Brit sympathizers were generally tar and feathered, a punishment which was embarassing and irritating, but seldom fatal, unless they decided to heat the tar first.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
notyoueither
|
 |
of naught
Aug 2001 time: 22:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kuciwalker
There weren't all that many British civvies around, actually. And there were... repercussions... for being a loyalist |
You might be surprised. First though, you have to understand that many people who were not living in the British Isles thought of themselves as British. Not English, or Irish, Welsh, or Scots directly, but still British.
The wik link I have is written a bit strangely (the guy is awkward in imitating a formal style) but the significance for Canada of the Revolution and the United Empire Loyalists (ie, Brits of the New World) is there to be seen.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Empire_Loyalists
In essence, three of the original five Canadian provinces were colonised largely by refugees from the Revolutionary War. There were that many of them (the refugees) and those who came here underwent some significant hardships to remain with the Crown. It's not mentioned in the link, but many others went South to the Caribbean.
The influence of the Loyalists in Canada runs strongly for 150 years or more. One King, One Flag, One Fleet, One Empire, from the early 20th century when Canadians opted to fund RN dreadnaughts rather than building our own, comes from the feeling of the people here that they were British first and from some colony second. It isn't until after the shock of the First war and then the trials of the Second that Canadians sought to cement our own unique nationality.
Incidently, anyone born in Canada as late as 1946 was born a British subject, so who were those large numbers of people who fought against the Revolution directly, or who left when the Revolution succeeded?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|