 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
I wouldn't say Americans are pathologically anti-Russian. I would say a lot of Americans are pathologically pro-American.
It starts at an early age, saluting flags, "One nation under God", and other brainwashing techniques.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Cruddy
I wouldn't say Americans are pathologically anti-Russian. I would say a lot of Americans are pathologically pro-American.
It starts at an early age, saluting flags, "One nation under God", and other brainwashing techniques. |
Very true. It is obviously a form of mental disease to be proud to be an American. The left in the US, of course, does not share this disease and is very active in their criticism of America, believing as they do, that "America is part of the problem, not the solution," quoting Teddy Kennedy's speech last week.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Heresson
Like where?
Churchill was angry with Poles for not accepting Soviet propositions. |
Yeah, right - Churchill was a commie, a pinkass communist who got angry everytime when somebody refused Soviet propositions.
Btw, I was refering to his monumental work- World War II. This is where he called Poland a greedy hyena. In case if you didn't guess it already -he wrote this book after WW2.
quote: Probably guilty conscience. |
Churchill's guilty conscience
quote: As for provoking ww2, repeat it as often as possible.
No Russia-bashing can be as successful as your brilliant remarks. |
Truth hurts?
quote: Serb... The garnison defended, true. And what? |
They killed themselves, but didn't surender to your "liberators". That makes your obvious lie about "liberation" of Smolensk a total bullsh!t. Whom you tried to liberate there, dead bodies? It's the same kind of liberation Americans are trying to impose now in Iraq - conquerberation, exterminabiration and lieberation.
quote:
Polish garnison of Moscow defended as well. |
To save their pity asses.
quote: And for boiling... I'm sure it was a wide-spreaded.
We, in Poland, still have a Day of St Serb,
in which each family meets over a dish of a boiled Russian up till now. Beautiful tradition. |
I know. It's so-called "advanced Polish civilization".
quote: Again, Putin seems to believe Him in that matter. |
Bullshit. He never said he believes in this Goebels's fake. Anyhow, I have to repeat it once again- Putin makes history, not study history. He has plenty of other things to do and his value as historian is probably pretty low.
quote: If Goebels said Russians are brave people, would You not believe Him as well? |
I would not believe a single word of the chief of Hitler's propaganda. Esp. when he tries to whitewash nazis by blaming Soviets.
quote: No "Soviet Aschwitz". Gulag. |
What Gulag? Once again- Gulag is the Glavnoe Upravlenie LAGerei (General Deportment of Prisons). It's state's institution whose duty is to manage and supervise prisons. Every country on this planent has such institution. What exactly Soviet prison you are lying about?
quote: What for? I'm thanking them in general. |
By calling them conquerors?
quote: What do You want from me, Serb, in this matter, huh? |
Nothing.
Last edited by Serb on 03-02-2005 at 11:31
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by molly bloom
You know I was just jesting, you crazy Russkie, don't you?
|
I was jesting as well.
quote:
I toast you with a glass of Russian tea, comrade, sweetened with a spoonful of jam. |
Who the hell drinks tea like that? Probaly only a moron from "Sex and the city" who pretended to be Russian?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
Nostalgia for the Soviet Union, taking quotes out of context, taking for granted that being surrounded by NATO means being isolated (surrounded? China is in NATO? Kazakhstan? odd definition of surrounded)
Yup, its the Nation all right. |
Look boy, when we tried to bring some of our equipment to Cuba in early 60s, you nearly started WW3 over this. Try to imagine we bring Canada and Mexico into our military alliance and perhaps you'll understand how much concerned we are. And better shut-up about paranoia.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by BeBro
If we can believe Serb you have to fear nothing because your glorious army with its superior equipment will eliminate every threat within nanoseconds. |
We will of course, as we always did when the west waged their crusades against Russia, but not within nanoseconds and it will cost us millions of lives.
You've never outnumbered us so greatly as now. Now it's about 4:1 in your favour. But who cares? If you'll try something, will kick your pity arses once again.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Serb
Look boy, when we tried to bring some of our equipment to Cuba in early 60s, you nearly started WW3 over this. Try to imagine we bring Canada and Mexico into our military alliance and perhaps you'll understand how much concerned we are. And better shut-up about paranoia. |
someone let me know when NATO puts nuclear weapons into Lithuania. Or Poland, for that matter.
(Oh yes, we did put them into Turkey - and pulled them out when USSR pulled its nukes out of Cuba)
BTW a historic note - NATO wasnt a US led alliance that expanded into europe. It started as a grouping of UK, France, and Benelux, that US joined. Brussels Treaty. Ergo NATO started closer to the Russian border than to the US.
Last edited by lord of the mark on 04-02-2005 at 00:35
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Commy
|
 |
St. Louis, MO, USA
Mar 2004 time: 05:29
|
|
Okay, so let's face it. Since one out of three or four Americans have guns, and since the US has one of the largest militaries, beaten only by China and Indonesia, and since America has like 8 nuclear subs armed with nukes on them, the odds of even the whole world defeating the american military AND the state militias AND the 70 million american civilians that own shotguns and have nothing to lose...are well...pretty slim, to say the least...not the mention that the world powers would have been nuked first...
So maybe the rest of the world has 6 billion people. And maybe only 1 billion of them, at the most, even have guns in their houses, i mean, real guns...and the chance of all of them wanting to attack america, much less getting about to america, are slim to none...never find the nuclear fallout...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|