 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oerdin
I'm Israel-Palestined out. Besides what makes this cease fire different from the last 10? There's some hope because Arafat is dead |
Er, understatement of the decade? Thats precisely whats different. AFAICT whats happening now is just what Abbas intended when he first became PM in 2003, before Arafat squeleched him. Its not just Abbas - hes got a decent Interior Minister in place, IIUC, Dahlan is playing a big role, and theres a cleaner Finance Minister. The security forces are being reformed. These are the changes everyone knew were needed, but that Arafat stopped.
And Pal security forces are patroling the borders of Gaza, and it SEEMS so far, are actually trying to stop attacks on Israel. This is exactly what Israel has said was necessary to show that peace is possible. And so far Israel has responded as theyve always said they would. And even IF Sharon is insincere, the Israeli public is watching, is quite aware of whats going on. The Pals are doing what theyre supposed to more than at any time since 1996 - and, I think, more than they did then. There is more reason to think that peace is really possible than at any time since Oslo.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Solver
|
|
Apolyton Duke Of Something
|
 |
Latvia, Riga
Sep 2000 time: 07:26
|
|
This is looking good now, since the Palestenian security forces indeed seem to be trying to prevent attacks on Israel and shelling of Israeli settlements. Arafat was looked at as an icon, a personification of the fight against Israel, while Abbas seems more reasonable than that. He doesn't have a strong position yet and he does need support from Hamas and similar organizations, but after all, Hamas doesn't like it when the IDF attacks them either, and so they must also be happy about a ceasefire.
There is no doubt that the Israeli Palestenian relations will remain very tense, but at least there is now hope of terror acts stopping for a considerable amount of time. And Abbas, just as predicted, is trying to see what diplomacy can provide before he takes a violent and noncomittal state, which he hopefully won't. The good part is that Sharon is actually satisfied.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
I wouldnt trust Hamas if they DID participate. |
Ditto. The last time around, one of the Hamas spokesperson admitted that they joined the temporary ceasefire in order to rearm and rebuild, not out of an interest for peace.
Last edited by Edan on 08-02-2005 at 21:28
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:26
|
|
Haaretz
"Analysis / The intifada's graduation party
By Aluf Benn
Four leaders will gather in Sharm el-Sheikh today to confirm that Yasser Arafat is dead and to declare a new era for the regions. It's the intifada's graduation party, where Mahmoud Abbas and Ariel Sharon will announce an end to the hostilities and the start of a new road. Arafat apparently won't be mentioned, not even in the Palestinian speech. But his departure created the new opportunity more than any other factor.
At the last summit, in Aqaba in June 2003, the American stage managers controlled the details. They dictated the speeches of the leaders and produced an impressive TV spectacle, which quickly faded in a new wave of terror and assassinations. This time Sharon is going to an Arab state alone, opposite three Arab leaders, and without an American babysitter. "No doubt the speeches won't be as good this time," they said in Sharon's office yesterday, "but we're hoping the actions will be more successful."
Israel wants the summit to focus as much as possible on security and as little as possible on the "political horizon." Sharon wants a public commitment from Abbas to halt and uproot the terror and in exchange he will promise an end to military activity, gestures like freeing prisoners and transferring cities and a lot of positive and optimistic words. And that's where his generosity will end.
Sharon will express a commitment to the road map but will make clear that talk about it will begin only after the disengagement from Gaza and the northern West Bank. The promise of a Palestinian state will be held out as collateral for a quiet, coordinated withdrawal. This is Sharon's order of events: after the summit, a period of calm, to enable the Palestinian Authority to begin dismantling the terrorist infrastructure and Israel to prepare for the disengagement.
Yesterday the sides exchanged drafts of their speeches. The original draft of the Palestinian speech detailed Israeli injustices with a paragraph about the separation fence, one about Jerusalem and another about refugees. The Israelis said, no problem, we'll add "Bush's letter" about settlement blocs to our speech. After four hours of bargaining, the Palestinians softened. Abbas will say "there are further issues under dispute" like the fence, and they will be discussed in the future.
Foreign policy is always derived from domestic policy and Sharon's main expectations are focused on the political arena at home. The live broadcasts from Sharm el-Sheikh, the pictures of the embraces with Mubarak, Abbas and Abdullah, the anecdotes and color stories about the wonderful friendships the prime minister forged with the neighbors' leaders are supposed to bolster Sharon's public position and weaken the disengagement's opponents. The summit will enable Sharon to boost his ratings in the polls this coming weekend.
And then all that remains will be waiting to see if the promises are kept and the conflict is really over, or whether this time, too, the declarations will evaporate in a renewed outbreak of fighting.'
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|