 |
| |
|
|
Saras
|
 |
Vilnius, Lithuania
Apr 1999
time: 06:27
|
|
quote:
Prince Charles to marry Camilla
Prince Charles is set to marry his long-term partner Camilla Parker-Bowles, Clarence House says.
No wedding date has been confirmed at this stage, but reports have suggested 6 April is one possible date.
The move will end years of speculation on their relationship which has spanned decades after they first met in 1970.
The Prince of Wales, who is the heir to the throne, was previously married to Princess Diana, who died in a car crash in Paris in 1997.
The princess famously referred to Mrs Parker Bowles as one of the contributing factors to the breakdown of her marriage to Charles.
The couple, who had two sons - princes William and Harry - were divorced when Diana died.
Mrs Parker Bowles' current position has meant that her status was dogged with problems, including her seating at social functions away from her partner.
Last June, Mrs Parker Bowles was mentioned in the Prince's accounts, which marked a new realm of acceptance. |
What would the British tabloids do if there was no Royal family? 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Richelieu
|
|
Gatineau
Dec 2001
time: 00:27
|
|
Good for him.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Zulu Elephant
|
|
Couldn't give a damn. My girlfriends screaming bloody murder though. "Why should my taxes support that marriage wrecking *****"
|
|
| |
|
|
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000
time: 00:27
|
|
So they've changed the rules since the time of those fascist symps, the Duke and Duchess of Windsor?
Last edited by chegitz guevara on 10-02-2005 at 18:59
|
|
| |
|
|
|
the_ceebs
|
|
quote:
If he's marrying a divorcé, doesn't that mean he's not eligible to become King? |
Well seing as the Church of England was set up so that they could divorce and remarry whoever they liked, I think that's a tad unlikely. Although every talking head will come out and have an opinion on it ,
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002
time: 21:27
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Dauphin
Besides they are net providers to the economy simply by existing. |
how is that possible?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001
time: 00:27
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by MRT144
how is that possible? |
It really doesn't cost the taxpayers much to keep them around and their mere existence draws in tourist and media dollars. I can't vouch for them being net providers, but I could see how it might be the case.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27.
Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-02-2005 14:55
|