 |
|  |
 |
|
Odin
|
 |
Biology Nerd at Minnesota State University Moorhead
Sep 2000 time: 23:23
|
|
While This thread is on the topic, if we write a new constitution what should be in it? Here are my ideas, basically I want to combine some aspects of parlimentary and presidential systems:
1. A divided executive. A president elected by popular vote for a 4 year term who is the Comander-in-chief, top diplomat, and can veto legislation (including a limited line-item veto on budget bills). And a prime minister and associated cabinet, appointed by the Senate, which heads the federal beauracracy, can dissolve the Senate, and call senatorial elections.
2. House stays the same, but with constitutional checks against gerrymandering. Senate filled by proportional representation, with elections every 4 years unless an election is called by the Prime Minister. Congress can overturn presidential veto by 2/3 majority. House can overturn legislatinve decisions of the Cabinet by majority vote.
3. Judicial review preserved. Supreme Court justices and Federal judges are nominated by the President and confimed by the Senate, serve 15 year terms.
4. Federal structured is mostly preserved as is, except for elections, which are now done by the federal government.
5. Amendments are proposed by Congress, must pass both houses with a 2/3 vote, which then procceeds to a popular referendum which requires a 2/3 majority to pass.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
quote: Originally posted by alva
Sadam's regime could hardly be called the standard in today's world. |
Neither was those countries mentioned as examples of demowars in their time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by notyoueither
The Yanks came together for cooperation as well. It was easy for them, sharing the same language and many other things, but there were differences between New England and Sourthern cultures.
The 'one nation, damn all else' came later, didn't it? |
US states were never fully independent sovereign units. unlike European kingdomes made into- yes, north and south were different, just as England as Scotland were different, or the north of France and the South of France were different, Spain was an amalgam of different kingdoms with all sorts of differences, ditto Italy in North and south. I don;t see how the Civil war in the US anbd the defeat by the Central government of smaller subunits differs from a lot of Centraling movements in Europe centuries before, heck, those smaller European mini states had much longer histories of eminity than the short lived US states had back in 1860.
No, the forming of the EU is fundamentally different from the creation of a United States.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|