 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:22
|
|
Haven't seen a thread on this so . . .
quote: During his failed campaign last fall against Barack Obama (D) for the Illinois Senate seat, Alan Keyes lashed out at Mary Cheney, the lesbian daughter of Vice President Cheney. Keyes told a radio interviewer that Mary Cheney was a "selfish hedonist." Then, without having been asked anything about his own family, he volunteered that "if my daughter were a lesbian, I'd look at her and say, 'That is a relationship that is based on selfish hedonism.' I would also tell my daughter that it's a sin and she needs to pray to the Lord God to help her deal with that sin." |
Well guess what, Al?
Maya, 19, says . . . she is -- "a liberal queer."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...-2005Feb12.html
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Wycoff
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
Cheney must be a better human being. |
Maybe Cheney doesn't care about homosexuality as much as Keyes does.
Cheney doesn't strike me as being particularly religious; rather, he seems like the typical corporate whore Republican, a Gordon Gecko type who cares far more for the big business part of the Republican party than the moral values crowd. The big business types are the masters of the party; they just use relgion as a way to get poor conservative people to vote for them, even though Republican economics are against the interests of those poor conservatives.
Last edited by Wycoff on 27-02-2005 at 02:47
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Wycoff
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Odin
If social issues were not an issue the Republicans would be a dead party, it would be Dems vs. Libertarians, with about 65% of the voters Democrat. |
The Dems aren't that much different from the Repubs economically. Maybe if they were, social/moral issues wouldn't be such a big deal.
Last edited by Wycoff on 27-02-2005 at 08:27
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Wycoff
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Odin
The Dems want a nice, proper welfare state like every other civilized western nation. the Republicans want a Corporate Republic (like the one in CtP). |
Maybe if they did they could have won on Ohio. The Dems haven't been particulalry strong with job creation; the unions still remember that Clinton was the NAFTA president. Kerry never campaigned for universal healthcare. No one really pushes for more public works/public infra-structure type projectsFrom everything I've observed, the Dems are Republicans-Lite on economics. That makes their economic programs easy targets for Republican candidates, because at least Republicans can use the Tax-cutting rhetoric.
That makes social issues that much more important politically, as that's where the two parties are most different. Thus, I think that the importance of social issues are inlated. If the Dems downplayed their social issues (like Gavin Newsome and his Gay Marriages), while taking economic stances that were clearly inline with the needs of the lower middle class and bottom class people, then the Dems. would win elections. Instead, the Dems try to appeal to the same upper middle class voters to which the Repubs appeal. They ignore/ chastise the lower, rural clases, while the Repubs at least make a social appeal to them. That's why the Dems can't win the Appalachians or Ohio. Unless they change their economic programs, they may lose PA and MI.
If we had a proportional system, a Perot like socially conservative, economically nationalist/populist party would win at least 25-30% of the votes. The reason that most of the swing states are swing states is that neither party adequately fills that need; therefore, parties that don't really fit have to compete to win voters who don't fully buy into them.
Last edited by Wycoff on 27-02-2005 at 10:18
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|