 |
|
Main_Brain
|
|
Economic World Center
Jul 2002 time: 06:18
|
|
Winter Games ;=)
Ah sweet Times.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
snoopy369

|
 |
Of the Peanuts Gallery
Apr 2004 time: 23:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by child of Thor
I look under my computer desk, blow a bit of dust and behold some classic nostalga, i play it fairly often too
I have the odd bit of downloaded software(horrors!), but it only gets to that if i just cant find the title i'm interested in anywhere to buy, and i get those from a place that if asked removes any title it has on its lists. Seems ethical to me(as its a fairly well known site).
Still part of the fun is tracking down a real origonal with all the maps, pull outs etc.
I had quite a heavy few weeks on ebay a while ago untill i managed to get a copy of Daggerfall. But i eventualy got it and worked out how to install and play the thing with minimal crashing.
Real boxed origonals just make you feel like you really own something, its not just(maybe dubious) data on your harddrive, and your supporting the folks who make these games we love |
Ag, i think that you are correct, that dl'ing a game for say nintendo that you own legitimately is legal, or at least not illegal.
Copyright law in respect to digital media has generally been interpreted to mean that you have the right to own one copy of the digital data itself, in any media you choose, in useable form, and you also may generally make a backup copy for archival purposes, as long as you only run one copy of such a program at any one point (or as many copies as you've paid for).
For example, I own one copy of Civ3, and have it installed on both my computer and my girlfriend's computer, but only play it on one or the other.
Sony sued a while back and tried (in various ways) to get Bleem! and Connectix to stop making playstation emulators; they failed legally but succeeded commercially (buying out connectix and driving bleem! into bankruptcy through legal fees). (This site discusses the dispute, in part.) Although Sony succeeded in killing both companies, the legal ramification was that emulators are considered legal.

|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
dunk
|
 |
Philadelphia, PA
Mar 2002 time: 00:18
|
|
I've played many a game on emulators.
I've had many a session of Kennedy Approach and Dr. Creep.
In terms of abandonware. The issue that is at core is the definition of it. If I hold the copyright to something, it is my right and my right alone to publish it for public use, sale, whatever. Who knows? 5 years from now, Sega / Nintendo / Atari / Commodore may decide to publish an emulator of their own and allow DLing of ROMs from a website for a fee. It's their right to do so or not do so at their choosing.
Several games have been released for free public distribution, Ultima IV is one of them. But, EA / Origin still holds the copyight for the game and can cease that practice any time it desires to.
Copyright law is intended to create an incentive for creating an original work such as a novel, computer game, etc etc. By distributing games for free without permission of the copyright holder is illegal no matter how you look at it, regardless of how long C64s haven't been manufactured. Also, regardless of whether the recipient has paid for a copy of the game in the past. Does having paid for a book 10 years ago entitle you to a new copy if the book falls apart or is lost? No. Or a braille version if you lose your sight? No. Or a paperback copy if you decide you'd rather only tote around the smaller one? No.
That being said, it sure is fun to fire up a game of Archon.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:18
|
|
1. IIUC the key legal issue re abandonware has been who has to notify whom, and the difficulties of doing so. If a site will really remove a publishers games cause the pub puts up a generic statement against abandonware, and doesnt even have to contact the site, that seems pretty reasonable to me - how hard is that. The publishers may be unwilling to make such disticintions, for fear of not being able to control it once theyve agreed to give any legitimacy - but their hardass stand may be hurting them, by looking unreasonable.
I acknowldege Polys position, since they depend on pubs, and not all pubs are reasonable.
2. Where a pub DOES decide to withhold abandonware, thats there right - they could have many different reasons to, cause they are thinking of doing a sequel (yes, it might help a sequel to giveaway an old game, but thats the pubs decision to make), etc
3. OTOH, copyright isnt forever. Its supposed to expire at some point, and material is supposed to enter the public domain. It seems logical that in a field like software, where tech updates obsolece games, and payback cycles are short, that using copyright lengths from traditional media (themselves perhaps unreasonably lengthened) is unreasonable.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|