 |
| |
|
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:24
|
|
Don Enrique de la Frontera, (also called Don de la Frontera, or DDLF)(1) was Charles I's regent in Spain (although the lands of Aragon objected to sharing a regent with Castille, they had not rebelled since the ascent of Charles). While Charles' prolonged absence from the kingdom was a matter of some discontent, it was undoubtedly associated with Austrias many wars, and its growing power. (2) For Don Enrique, it was the chance to run the increasingly centralized Spanish state. But to what end? The Council of State was debating that, one chilly November day in 1540, at the palace in Toledo (not Madrid, please, Paradox)
More to come.
(1) Frontera = Frontier = March = Mark. Get it?
(2) Charles absence from Spain is historical, and this explains the game situation where you play as Spain but not Austria, even though you share a monarch.
Last edited by lord of the mark on 20-04-2005 at 00:04
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lord of the mark
|
|
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:24
|
|
"My lord regent", began Juan Velazquez, Archbishop of Toledo. "News comes daily from the north of the spread of the heresy begun by that worthless monk of Wittenberg. For twenty years it has spread and we have averted our eyes, hoping it would be stopped by local authority, as other heresies have in the past(1). Yet it has not, it has corrupted and taken over local authority, and a few years ago even so mighty a kingdom as England betrayed the true and universal church. Our soveriegn, the glorious Charles, is struggling with it in the Empire, yet we go not to his aid. When, my lord, shall we go?"
Don Enrique listened, and nodded. He then turned and recognized the young Duke of Sedonia.
"What his grace the Archbishop says is true, my lord, and yet there is much to this matter beyond his graces words. The arms of Spain have not been idle these last two decades. Rather they have struck for Spain and for Christ, in the lands beyond the sea. Roanoke, Savannah, Cuba, Jalisco, Yucatan, Cajamarca do these mean nothing? We have destroyed heathen kingdoms, planted churches, and brought the gospel to savages in city and forest. We have brought more souls to Christ than this Luther has turned from Mother Church. And yes, we have gained wealth and power, but is that to be denigrated? With all due honor to his majesty this struggle in Europe is not for a day. It took four hundred years to destroy the power of the Moorish infidel in our land - it was only finally crushed in the 1420's under King Juan(2). If as seems likely, heresy has gained a base in the north, we will need the gold and other wealth of America to defeat it. Even now our forces are at war in a place called Peru, and we must put our all into this noble crusade"
With growing anger the Archbishop rose "My lord, we may perhaps strike at the heretics BEFORE they grow strong. Can we rely on the Austrians to act for us? And what will they think of Spain if we do so? And besides the heretics, is there not also the threat of the Turks - who wish, without a doubt, to again try to assault Italy?"
"The Venetians have the Turks well in hand"
"They could use our help"
"Ha, they would turn on us as soon as they could, it is them we must be careful of - we must not strengthen Venice!!!"
"So!!! You would see Christians defeated by Moors, for the sake of your powermongering schemes?"
"By Christs blood, I have tasted battle against the heathens, while you sat in your cathedral and partook of feasts - were you not a priest I would take no such insults!!!!"(3)
"Gentlemen, gentlemen, we are brothers, are we not?" interjected the Don de la Frontera. We all want what is good for Spain AND for God's holy church. You have both said much that is useful for me to know, and I will consider your words carefully. But now let us adjourn, and dine, and let a new day perhaps give us new wisdom.(4)
(1) heresy was far from unknown in medieval Europe, but with exceptions like the Albigensians and Hussites, it was localized and put down by local authorities. The Archbishop is noting how Lutheranism is different.
(2) Of course in OTL (original time line) the reconquista was not completed till 1492 by Ferdinand and Isabella. This is the initial POD (point of divergence) for this timeline.
(3)The Duke would of course challenge anyone who insulted him to a duel. Since a priest can't duel, the insult from the Archbishop is particulalry galling.
(4) The DDLF dislikes namecalling and pointless squabbling, and prefers to reconcile different points of view.
Last edited by lord of the mark on 20-04-2005 at 00:40
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lord of the mark
|
|
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:24
|
|
The regent announced his decision the next day. For the duration of the war in Peru, Spain would attempt to maintain peaceful relations in Europe, while sending his majesty expressions of support (IE as little money as possible) in his struggle in the empire, and and wishing Venice well in its defense against the Turks. (1) Charles was certainly displeased, but was not prepared to address the Spanish problem now. The Archbishop of Toledo was placed in charge of the missionizing efforts in Mexico and the Cherokee lands (it was whispered by some that the failure of the missions in Saltillo was due to his siphoning off of funds) While claiming that all resources were needed for the struggle to bring the gospel to the Inca peoples of Peru, Don Enrique was quietly planning on other developments as well - especially continued colonization efforts in Carolina and the Caribbean, administrative buildup in Mexico, and the possibility of industrial development in the lands of the crown of Aragon.
(1) Its was not uncommon for one part of Charles' "empire" to put its own interest above others. Each considered itself independent, and the sharing of a monarch as a mere coincidence. The amount Charles could extract for common military endeavours depended on the constitutional situation in each kingdom - IIRC, most in Castille, least in Aragon, intermediate in Italy. Taxes in Germany(HRE) could be used for defense against the Turk, and against heretics in Germany, but not necessarily elsewhere.
Last edited by lord of the mark on 20-04-2005 at 00:15
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
lord of the mark
|
|
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:24
|
|
Spring 1556. Toledo, Spain
"Sire, I wish to offer my joy and delight at your coronation, and to offer my sword to you as a willing soldier in your service"
"Rise from your knees, Don Enrique" Phillip said with a sigh. "I've had as much ceremonial speech in the last week as any human being should be subject to. And IF I didnt want to retain you in my service, this kind of thing wouldnt help."
"Your Majesty ..." stammered Don Enrique, Don de la Frontera.
"You should already know from our past interactions, Don Enrique, that what I want from you first is your silence - I will listen, but at my own time"
DDLF nodded in silence.
"I have not ignored you, when I was at my fathers side in Italy and in Flanders. Even had I not intuited my fathers plans, my love for Spain would have kept my eye focused on what you have been doing. Now that he has abdicated, and I am king, I wish to review your actions, and discuss future plans"
Hesitantly, DDLF opened his mouth "Sire, you still require my counsel?"
Phillip, normally dour, laughed at this. "Yes, Don Enrique. You shall no longer bear the burden of executive responsbility, but your thoughts and advice will still be of use to me."
He went on "during the early years of your regency, you acted brilliantly - the conquest of Mexico and much of North America are deeds that will resonate to the glory of Spain for all time. However it is your actions since 1540 that require explanation.
In 1540 you opposed Spanish intervention in central Europe, and persisted with your war in Peru, which dragged on for another six years before it failed. For the next 6 years, you left Peru at peace, and yet did nothing in Europe. And now you are at war with Peru AGAIN. You seem a stubborn man, Don Enrique. In that you are much like me - but perhaps I need advisors who are more flexible, more willing to learn from mistakes, to balance my own inclinations. And now I have inherited not just the lands of the crowns of Castille, Leon, and Aragon, but also Lombardy and Mantua, and Flanders and Brabant. Indeed I inherit Burgundian claims to the rest of the low countries, now held by Gelre, and to Franche Comte, held by Helvetia. And both those powers, I note, tolerate the new Calvinist heresy. I would like to see the destruction of both. And ultimately deal with England, that nest of heresy. Yet you have argued, persuasively, i might add, for leaving heresy alone in Europe - and yet heresy has grown. How do you explain yourself?"
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lord of the mark
|
|
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:24
|
|
"Sire, I thank your majesty for the opportunity to explain my actions.
"When we went to war with the Inca Empire, with Peru, our leaders were Hernan de Cortes and Francisco Pizzaro, men of excellence, whose knowledge of American matters, of military affairs, and whose undaunted courage made them well nigh irreplaceable. By a stroke of misfortune, they both died in 1540 in Peru, to our grief. We still made progress in the war, but at great cost - rebellions among the subjects, exhausted by war, broke out in Bearn, in Sardinia, and most especially in the heathen provinces of America. Meanwhile war had delayed reform in our army which was falling behind Europe, especially France and Austria.(1) Our administrative development was delayed. So it seemed clear a breather was needed by this kingdom. It took time to beat the stubborn heathen enough to see reason. The final treaty, which ceded us 3 provinces and the entire Inca treasury, was, if not a great victory, certainly no failure.
Once peace was reached, and the rebellions suppressed, we proceeded to the development of the kingdom. I know you are aware of some of this, but I will fill you in on some details.
We expanded the tax collection system to the wealthier new world provinces, increasing royal revenues. Here in Spain, we have created a new system of royal courts -that has been established in the largest provinces in both the crowns of Castille and Aragon"
"That was a neat trick Don Enrique, getting the lands of Aragon to accept a common administration with Castille"(2)
"Thank you your majesty - that has always been the guiding vision of my regency, to press for governmental centralization, even when this cost short term instability and rebellion. We have done this in the face of war, and of the inevitiable decentralization that has come with the new conquests, but it has been my goal to continue on this path"
"Very well, go on - you spoke of courts"
"Yes, your majesty. The next step administratively is to consolidate provincial governance under a system of governors who will be centrally appointed, and will rotate after a term of years, and who will coordinate taxes, justice, and local services"
"like the intendants of France?"(3)
"More or less your majesty, although we will attempt to follow Spanish legal precedents. That is what my staff is currently researching - again, no easy feat as we attempt to do design it so that it will meet our administrive needs without doing more than necessary violence to all the local traditions"(4)
"Including in the lands of Aragon?"
"Yes, including in the lands of Aragon."
"How long?"
Don Enrique frowned. "At this point at least 20 years till we appoint the first governor. It could be accelerated with more money though"
"And where might you get more money, my lord?"
"We expect the new tax collecting system to bring in more money from America. Trade continues to grow in Seville, and in America, and we tax that. Our specie shipments from America grow, but that has created inflation. And we expect to improve the efficiency of the American provinces as the heathen become Christians, and fit better into our social system, and become less rebellious"
(1) We were at like 5, while France was at 11. 
(2) Indeed, Aragon and Catalonia jealously guarded their independence throught the 16th and 17th century, not losing it till the Bourbon inheritance. In this TL Don Enrique has managed to overcome this by his commitment to moving the "centralization slider" to the right, and his good management of "stability hits". I would suggest for a Spain being played as decentralized, RP would require a house rule of keeping Aragon administratively distinct from Castille.
(3) actually I think we might be a tad early for intendants in France, at least in OTL.
(4) IIUC, this is what central administrators spent a lot of time doing, at least in places like France that were commited to advancing centralization. Seems a good real world interpretation of the game mechanic of investments in "infrastructure technology"
Last edited by lord of the mark on 20-04-2005 at 00:24
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lord of the mark
|
|
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:24
|
|
" Yes, Don Enrique, I have noted your progress in the conversion of the heathen. It has gone better in recent years, has it not?"
"Yes, your majesty. It has improved since we assigned that task to the Franciscan order"(1)
"It had previously been run by the Archbishop of Toledo, no? There were problems then? And then the Archbishop died of a stomach ailment, did he not? He had never suffered from stomach ailments before if I remember correctly. Odd." (2)
Quietly, Don Enrique responded "Perhaps it is as the common people say - he was stealing funds meant for the holy church, and was striken down by God for his sins"(3)
"Ah" smiled King Phillip. "The common people. Wherever DO they get such ideas? There is more to you then meets the eye, Don Enrique" (4)
(1) IIRC there were changes from time to time in OTL in which part of the Spanish church was responsible for missions. The Franciscans eventually getting California. I think the OTL history is much more complex on this than I have shown.
(2) King Phillip II ain't a doctor, but one thing he ISN'T is naive.
(3) In this instance, had the good Archbishop employed a food taster, the workings of God's providence might have been delayed.
(4) Indeed, there is.
Last edited by lord of the mark on 20-04-2005 at 00:30
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lord of the mark
|
|
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:24
|
|
"The military improvements have gone well, your majesty. We have improved the army's organization, learned to make arquebuses and siege cannon, and trained the army in new tactics to take advantage of the new weapons. (1) We now have a respectable European army, though we have a way to go to catch up to France and Austria (2)
We are using the new arms and tactic in the current war with the Inca, which is going more rapidly as a result. We have three of their strong places under siege. While it is true they have an army of almost 40,000 just to the south, our troops can gather and hold them off if they attempt to relieve any of the sieges. Meanwhile we have further armies on the way, that should put us in a good situation to defeat the main Inca army.
Meanwhile we can quickly get into position to at least defend your majesty's Italian and Burgundian inheritances. We have a military access agreement with Genoa which will ease troop movement to Lombardy. We can reach Flanders by sea, and our naval position is strong."
"And what then Don Enrique, what do we do AFTER the Inca war is over. I think we need to address the priorities of war in Europe, whom to attack when, and how. Im not sure what you would call such a plan, Don"
"Grand Strategy, your majesty?"
"Yes, that will do. We need a grand strategy for Phillip II."(3)
(1) That is we've reached tech 9
(2) They're at tech 12
(3)http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/t...890325?v=glance
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
lord of the mark
|
|
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:24
|
|
summer, 1559, Toledo.
Present: Don Enrique, special counselor to the king. (DDLF)
Duke of Sidonia, Chief Constable of Castille
Don Gonzago, Aide to the Duke of Sidonia
DDLF to Duke: Francis, its so good to see you again - you're back from Roussilon - is the army ready to take on the rebels in Bearn?
Duke: Yes, Enrique, it wont be easy, but the siege will be broken, i have no doubt.
DDLF: Good. I dont fear all these rebellions. The forces in Mexico will deal with the rebellion there, and then we only have the one left in Chimu. I see no reason to settle for anything less than full conquest of Peru - we can handle the rebellions.
Duke: Enrique, my aide, Don Gonzago, has some ideas that he thinks will shorten the war against Peru.
DDLF: Very well, speak up, Don Gonzago
Don Gon: My lord, as you know we have instituted new tactics and procedures in the army, these last 10 years.
DDLF: yes, that has gone well, and we now see the fruit
Don Gon: There is one new approach to war we have not yet used. That is to use our new infantry tactics and discipline to directly assault a besieged city. I suggest we try that in Peru.
DDLF:I have heard of such techniques, but is it not costly of mens lives? Spain has manpower in reserve, but to use the money to train them would detract from everything else we wish to do - and we cant afford to diminish the army, not with things in Europe heating up.
Don Gon: Those great costs are when launching an assault against a well fortified city, manned by strong forces. The cities in Peru are barely fortified, and our infantry is much better trained then the primitive heathen. I think casualties need not be that high.
DDDLF: Is it not true that our sieging armies include many cavalry, and these are not suitable
Duke: It is true, Enrique, but we have been bringing more infantry down as the war has settled into sieges. While it will be difficult reorganizing the besieging forces, the situation is doable.
DDLF: I would advise that we start with one of the cities, and attempt this new tactic. Where would be suitable, Francis?
Duke: Potosi is not heavily manned, and our forces there would be well able to manage this.
DDLF: I agree.
Duke: Good. While I could have ordered this on my own authority, I wanted to discuss it with you, as you have had such a huge role in all the army reforms and improvements.
DDLF: Vaya con dios, my friend.
Last edited by lord of the mark on 21-04-2005 at 20:59
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
lord of the mark
|
|
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:24
|
|
Late summer, 1559. The Royal Palace, Toledo.
Present:
King Phillip the Second
Don Enrique, Don de la Frontera, Special counsel to the king.
DDLF: Your majesty, with victory within sight in Peru, we should begin planning for European expansion.
King: At last, Don Enrique. I am glad to hear of victory in Peru, and that we are at last turning to the problem of heresy in Europe. Why these blasphemous Calvinists are even a problem in Bearn - we must crush them, and then destroy their inciters in the low countries.
DDLF: Ah, sire, of course we shall be dealing with Bearn. Even as we speak an army marches there, and yes, we shall follow that up with a mission to restore them to the Universal Catholic Church. However I do not think Gelre should be our priority.
Phillip, angry: NO? What should be then, if not that swamp of heresy?
DDLF: Italy, your majesty. It is closer, and easier to bring troops too. It is richer, and being Catholic, will be easier to control and extract revenues from. After we have consolidated our position there we can then turn north. As for Gelre, the situation there is confused. While the people are mainly Calvinist, the government is Lutheran. I suspect that will lead to instability, which we may yet take advantage of.
King: Well, I am not so well versed in the varieties of heresy. I just wish to see it crushed, and not to constantly defer that happy event. But I can respond to you on the question of "grand strategy". Italy will not be so easy as you say - you omit the question of diplomacy, and alliances - this grand strategy you speak of is not all armies and ducats, I think. Where would we expand in Italy? Italy, apart from my own lands, is subject, either directly or via vassalage, to the Pope, and the two Republics - Genoa and Venice. Genoa, though not our ally, is our old friend, and the path by which we reach our Italian possesions from the sea. I would be loathe to turn them aside. I do hope you are not suggesting we take on the Papal States. Venice is a power many here have spoken against - they are not friendly to Spanish interests it is said, and they have done nothing against the heretics themselves - indeed they are now at war with the Papal States, and we could, I suppose, attempt to join that war. On the other hand, I cannot forget that they are still the guard at Europes door against the Turk - while the Turks are weakened now, i fear complacency about them. Attack Gelre, however, and it fits all our diplomatic needs, and gives us an expanded base for dealing with England, and her newly risen bastard-queen.
Last edited by lord of the mark on 21-04-2005 at 20:58
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
lord of the mark
|
|
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:24
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Micha
Hehe, thanks
So you will take on the Netherlands? Alright then, but be sure to keep a thousand gold coins in reserve so you can reinforce the units that fight the dutch rebels! |
[OOC (out of character?)]
Not necessarily. The point of this exercise, is, in part, to show the conflict between gameplay strategy and Roleplaying, and to look for means to resolve that. Phillip does not deny the difficulty of taking on Gelre (IE acknowledging your point) but he points out the diplo difficulties in Italy (largely an RP issue, but not entirely) and reiterates the (RP) reasons to focus on Gelre.
Within our story, Phillip will go with DDLF's suggestions, but DDLF must make clear that they contribute to Phillip's long run goals. He also has to be successful, or Phillip will look to other advisors.
Bio on DDLF.
He was born in 1498, and so is actually 2 years older than Charles the First (and Fiftht) He started in royal service as a teenager, under Ferdinand. He attempts to follow the pragmatism, modernism, and Spanish nationalism of Ferdinand. He held numerous offices, both military and civil, and became regent of Spain in 1534. He is now 61, so going from regent to advisor fits his personal goals - he's too worn out to play chief executive officer now. He has a son, Don Pedro (which will account for the DDLF going on royal advisor indefinitely)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lord of the mark
|
|
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:24
|
|
1565, Seville, Spain. Present, Don Enrique, DDLF. Don Pedro, his son.
DDLF: My son, welcome home. You are now a mature man - I am glad, for I am feeling my age.
DP: My father, i shall do all i can to help you.
DDLF: that is good my son. I shall need it, before i retire from the kings service. You have excelled, as soldier, as governor, as Viceroy in Mexico. Now you are to be on the Council of State.
DP: I bring many ideas on American affairs, but I know less of Europe, and the council will have to address that seriously now.
DDLF: I will let you know some things, but there is much still to be decided.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lord of the mark
|
|
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:24
|
|
DDLF: well, the first Flemish rebellion was two years ago - some say it was connected to the war in Peru - though that makes no sense to me, as we recruited NO flemish troops for South America, and had not increased taxes, and Im not sure what other reason there would be for Flemish burghers to care about the Incas. I think it had more to do with their general discontent with Spanish rule - I am old enough to remember when the kings father, Charles was crowned, how much discontent there was in Castille at the dominance of his Flemish advisors - with the rise of his Majesty Phillip, the Flemings must adjust to foreign rule. And I think the Calvinist heresy is also implicated - the Catholic provinces, like Brabant and Artois stayed loyal. Indeed they supplied most of the troops who crushed that rebellion.
The more recent one is the result of a rising of nobles and other interest in Flanders, attempting to avoid paying taxes for the common defense of the realm. While it might have been possible to defuse this with concessions and bribes, we simply could not afford this in wartime, with our treasure almost bare, nor could we afford the demonstration effect on other provinces. The viceroy, with my support, refused concessions. Indeed we confiscated much of the wealth of the rebel leaders, which we have used to fund the missions in Tallahassee province, which I know you are intimately familiar with. As you may know our standing army outside Antwerp was defeated and withdrew to Brabant, and the city is now under siege. We have built up an army of loyal forces in Brabant, including the defeated troops, and we are sending over 9,000 men from Spain under the Duke of Alba. We MUST crush that rebellion before we consider any further moves in Europe. I myself am reluctant to annex any more heretic provinces at this time, but the king presses for it.
As for Italy, the situation there is evolving. We have improved our relations with Pope. Venice made peace with his holiness, fought a war with his majesty's Austrian cousins, and now is at work with the Turks in alliance with Genoa. The Turkish war, and the Genoese alliance, make it very difficult to move against Venice, though she holds some tempting provinces in central Italy. I am leaning toward a guarantee of the Papal States, and a military access agreement. Beyond that I dont know what we can do.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lord of the mark
|
|
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:24
|
|
November 1570. Escorial Palace, Madrid.
Present: Don Pedro, Don de la Frontera, (son of Don Enrique)
Phillip II, King of Spain (1)
DDLF: Your majesty, you asked to see me?
KP: Yes, Don Pedro. Although i usually prefer written communication, today it is not your recommendation as secretary of the Council of Finance that I seek, but your general advice on the realm. I know that you have extensive experience of the Americas, and like your father, much wisdom on political affairs generally. By the way, my condolences on your fathers death - he was a good friend, and a great Spaniard.
DDLF: thank you, your majesty.
KP: What do you think of our position now, Don Pedro? We are at peace these last 5 years. I understand much has been done for the kingdom, but I wonder if we are adequately using our might.
DDLF: I understand that your majesty is unhappy that we have not addressed the problem of Gelre, who control provinces that belonged to your Burgundian ancestors, and who shelter heresy. But we should think carefully before getting involved there. All Europe is at peace now - all build to prepare, perhaps, for future conflict. For us to engage in war now could be quite dangerous. The Duke of Alba has his hands full in the Flemish provinces we already hold - hardly a season goes by that we do not hear from the north of a rebellion in Flanders, or Artois, or Luxembourg.
KP: what do you make of Cardinal Granevilles suggesting to send more troops from Milan to Flanders, and to send Parma to the new world.
DDLF: I heartily agree with it, your majesty. Milan and Mantua are quiet, and additional troops could easily be raised there in an emergency. Meanwhile there is no threat there. Unless France should look in that direction.
As for Parma to America, i like that very much, i have some thoughts on that.
KP: What do you say to those who say that we should ally with France against the heretics?
DDLF: I would certainly talk to the French, and explore common ground. But I would not expect much to come of that, I do not think the French will put their faith above their fear of your majestys family. Also, they continue to poke around America, and I think at SOME point we will need to deal with that - but not now, for now we should remain at peace.
KP: you spoke before of America - you suggest Parma lead a new war against Peru?
DDLF: no, your majesty - though my father was associated with the Peruvian wars, I do not suggest that. The large number of pagan provinces contributes to the difficulty of ruling this realm, drawing off as it does so many soldiers and administrators in an effort to control people who, though "conquered" barely acknowledge our rule. No, I suggest that we launch a massive effort to convert the many pagan provinces to Catholicism. This would ease our administration, integrate our empire, expand our resources...
KP: And honour almighty God, whose support we will need in any war!!!!
DDLF: Certainly, your majesty. But this will require strong forces, as serious missonary efforts will often trigger native revolts - that is why I want Parma there. We should also gradually increase the number of troops there, both by sending some from Europe (as some went with Parma) and by raising troops in America. We must also be prepared for frustration - these efforts dont always succeed.
KP: You will find me a man strong in persistence and perserverance.
(1) actually king of Aragon, Castille, Leon, The Netherlands, Naples, Sicily, and Milan. Which would be confusing, especially as he owns only the southern half of the Netherlands, and in other ways his current ownership doesnt map precisely to his titles.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lord of the mark
|
|
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:24
|
|
November 1570
Letter from the King to Don Pedro, DDLF, Secretary of the Council of Finance.
Don Pedro,
Could you please review for me the principle expenditures, other than raising and supporting armies and fleets, over the last several years - not a detailed breakdown with numbers (my head splits at those, and thats not what i need now) but more a general sense of where our resources have been going.
King Phillip
Letter from Don Pedro, DDLF, Sec of the Council of Finance, to King Phillip.
Your Majesty
The montly revenues have been going primarily to the project to develop a new administrative system, based on provincial governors. We have discussed this effort with you in more detail in the past. The effort is expected to improve provincial administration and economic productivity generally, in conjunction with expenditures on physical "infrastructure" . We are also spending on improved support for trade, which will enable us to gain more complete control over the trade centers in Seville, Antwerp, and Zacatecas. We are also spending on military and naval improvements, though my understanding is that the Council of State wants to reduce expenditures on army reforms and focus instead on naval reforms, as we lag far behind the English in particular. We are also spending on subsidies of various sorts to local groups and leaders, to maintain the peace of the realm, though again my understanding is the Council of State wishes to end that expenditure.
The annual census revenues are being used principally to expand the new judicial system. We now have it in about two thirds of the provinces in Spain, in all the major provinces in Flanders and Italy. We are currently expanding it in Luxembourg and in Navarre. We have recently paid for an expedition of additional colonists to the existing colony at Mobile.
As you know the conversion attempt at Tallahassee failed, and there is a large scale mission underway at Savannah. We will be attempting to scale down invesment in the judicial system in order to save money for another mission, to be sent whereever the Council for the Americas determines.
Don Pedro.
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24.
Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
16-04-2005 02:23
I could try some sort od different nonwestern country though. Maybe the Manchus, the tiny Hindu Vietnamese kingdom, or one of the Indian minors.
|