 |
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:23
|
|
.. opening to American stupidity! OK let's start 
First of all, why is it that you can speak 1) english 2) bad english? It's a bit amusing when some couples (read most) goes to some other country, and they freaking always start speaking BAD english. Is that helping any? Also, when the subject is the most trivial, most start using 'SIGN LANGUAGE'. CAN YOU UNDERSTAND ME. A BOX. A BOX. A BOX. Tip number one. Even though they don't speak english, treating them like retards won't help. I would say it's an interesting phenomenon. DOO YOUU SPEAAAK ENGLASSH? GOsh these people are retarded UNGGH! Naturally there are ones who makes better in these situations, and also speaks other languages as well. Note, especially you Dissident, saying that everyone should just learn english at this point makes the one suggesting this a retard... hey when in Rome.. or leave the mexicans alone.. which one is it gonna be? 
OK next up. Driving with 'stick'. Surprisingly many do master it, and actually it's clear that many knew how to do it before and had driven manuals.. so nto a problem really. What's up with the gas though? Does anyone know the difference between diesel and regular? Not just a problem with one couple and one season and one leg. No... What's up with that? 'Well in here..'' SHUT UP! You don't have to be stupid no matter where you are. Stop defending idiots with saying it's ok to be a retard blubber brain!
So.. what's up? 
ps. this is about amazing race stupidities. Brits and French are stupid too, when it comes to being outside their own country. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:23
|
|
haehaah I remember that episode .. it was a 'shut the hell up' moment... but she really is like that, and is genuine so... doesn't mean any bad but jeesh...
Some people are princesses too.. 'ohh it smells so bad in this country, disgusting'. I mean, if you want to be a jerk, sure.. of course most aren't like that at all and even some are able to enjoy their journey in poor parts of the world. Of course it's a race with million bucks on the line.. so it's not like you're there to open your eyes to the cultures and architecture.
But since this is not praising thread, because there are great moments too and sourceful people and hardcore decisions, I have to stick with the amazing stupidities .
I still can't get over the bad english and 'are you retarded' sign language. I mean, do they understand that it's .... annoying is the wrong word.. but that it's.. stupid? Making people feel like they're retarded like that. They won't get their message any faster that way. Besides, when they are trying to force their ways in taxis etc.. being outright rude to some folks, that they will actually get there slower in most cases? The couples who keep being smooth and nice even when the pressure is on, they always get the good service, because... well that's trivial. They say well it's a race, so they need to be bullying on, but some couples don't understand it will hinder them rather than help them. Some couples do it well though, they hide in behind smiles and laughs, trying to cheer on instead of 'MUY RAPIDOOOO!!!' 'ohh this guy doesn't know where he is going JEESH what an IDIOT!'. I mean, sure, they might be lost and idiot, but making it known will get them there slower and it will cost more as well . 'THEY ARE RIPPING US OFF BECAUSE WE ARE AMERICANS!'. No.. they are ripping you off because you were an IDIOT to that dude the whole way....... so I guess it's the law of karma.. the nice people finish better.. and that's the way it ought to be.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Japher
I never watched survivor, but I don't have a problem with Amber. Rob, however, can suk moneky dung for all I care. He's a posser and an arse. You can race nicely. |
I don't think they will win but I find them entertaining and there is no doubt they are good at this race. They have finished first in more legs than I can ever remember anyone doing
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Pekka
one thing that bothers me big time is the ... parts of the race where everyone has to wait like 10 hours for something to open, so everyone is on the same line again. I understand they have to do it like that, in order to make a working series, but it's frustrating for some I bet.. getting GREAT lead because of a great move they made, and how did they benefit.. well.. they didn't. Then again if that wasn't the way it was done, a couple could take a 3 day lead or something and win it for sures. Then again.,.. would that be a bad thing? Maybe it would...... wouldn't make an interesting final. |
Yup-- But they could easily set up the race to give people big leads as well. Lets say someone has a 3 hour lead, you could start them at 3 pm having to go somewhere that takes an hour and closes at 6. Since everyone else starts after 6, they would end up being 16 hours behind or something.
The "fairest way" might be for legs to start for the first couple only an hour or so before the opening of any necessary location . .. That way all leads are kept but no matter how you do things there will be things that are either great equalizers or great dividers ( like getting a flight out of a little place in Africa to India) It seems like if you don't make the flight one day, you will have to wait a full day for the next. Given the choice, the producers err on the side of bunching people back together.
No shock there
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Pekka
yeah.. right.. how about giving some other benefits for bigger leads, like.... uhmm.. better place for them to stay the night, for waiting and resting? of course the winners always get a prize like a trip to some nice location, but I think there could be a way to benefit the order they come in, in ways of letting them have better start. |
Well coming first does mean a longer rest-- I often wondered how long those mandatory rest periods were? Do they sack out for a few hours or is it a couple of days later?
I'm mainly thinking of the cameramen here .. . After running all day long I figured they would want to give thema rest as well
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Japher
Those who come in first get to leave 12 hours later, so it's not like they get a longer rest. |
True sort of-- They might get the same rest at the mandatory rest stop but it seems they invariably have a long stop somewhere in the leg where the leaders go to sleep while others are racing onward to catch up
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Japher
they may swap camera men...
|
An obvious thought. I was just thinking how expensive it would be to be sending people all over the world but then I figured that this show is still cheap to make even if they brought 2 camera crews for each of the initial teams.
Cameramen are probably used to irregular hours so going two legs in three probably isn't too bad . . . and heck , if the rest periods are no longer than 12 hours, the whole thing probably gets done in a month
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|