 |
|  |
 |
|
Commy
|
 |
St. Louis, MO, USA
Mar 2004 time: 05:13
|
|
Very true, conservatives in most countries would be considered die hard dictators in the US...even the US green party is more right economically than most countries...
Fundalmentalist, dictionary talk now, is someone who adheres to fundalmental principles, basically, a conservative on social issues...
Generally fundalmentalists are considered conservative, and very few would ever be called liberal (ignore economics)...
While I guess an extreme socialist that's Budhists could call them selves a fundalmentalist (extremely rare I presume...), for all intensive purposes, we can say they are strict conservatives that believe in traditional principles held by a religion or moral doctrine...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Commy
|
 |
St. Louis, MO, USA
Mar 2004 time: 05:13
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
Hmm.
"Conservative" is the same. As for "liberal," it means the same as "libertarian" in the US. "Right" and "left" are the same. |
Not exactly...conservatives in most countries, with UK as an exception, are more left than even the US green party...
Liberals are not libertarians, liberals are democrats...big difference, because claiming to be a liberal will get you killed, claiming to be a libertarian will get wierd faces...I would know, I live in the US on the borderline between the Republican states and the Democratic States...
Right and left almost always refer to economic issues...however, if you say you are left, many assume you are a democrat, if you say you are right, many assume you are republican...however, depending on the country, the degree of being left or right can vary...being "left" in the US can actually be "right" in say Germany or France...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Xian
|
|
quote: Originally posted by fender
. The factions are believable, well except for Miriam being so aggressive. This is not a Christian trait.
|
I totally disagree with just about everything you said, but this needs comment - Miriam is symbolizing fundamentalism, not christianity. These are not one in the same.
Throughout history christians have been by far the most violent faction of human beings on earth (Crusades, american slavery, the Holocaust, colonization, imperialism, both world wars etc. etc.). So its ridiculous to assume futuristic technology would change that fact.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
sentry33
|
 |
Warsaw, Poland
Jun 2004 time: 06:13
|
|
Yeah christianity is about mercy to the extreme, even at cost of oneself (just look at christ's example, john paul's 2nd life and so on).. though there are always people who use religion (anything that is convenient really) for their benefit (crusades, politics).
Its old testament that contains violent parts (eye for an eye) but its not what priests teach people in churches.
Muslim faith seems to be much more violent (Koran speaks about fighting nonbelievers with any means possible, and about Allah's vengeance that catches everyone), though I am not any expert here and can misinterpret.
---
But as far as game goes - I do not recall anything that precisely states which religion Miriam pursues. Surely there are some references to christianity, but not only.
To me it seems that she is following some futuristic mix of monotheistic religions - some catholic thoughts, some muslim, some utterly fictional.
And its pretty ok - this is a game after all meant to be fun for everyone who likes to think - nothing more, nothing less 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Senethro
|
|
I, Senethro of the Hive propose a new motion before the Chironian Planetary Council; That this thread be buried and bumped no more, as it is in clear violation of the Forum Necromancy Act of 2123 and the Prohibition of Entirely Subjective Religious Discussion Act.
I further more propose that if the conflict is not resolved or at least off the AC G/H/S front page in 10 days time that extensive carpet bombing using kitten and puppy jpegs be conducted until all thread participants cease activity under a hail of cuteness.
How does the rest of the council vote?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:13
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Senethro
I, Senethro of the Hive propose a new motion before the Chironian Planetary Council; That this thread be buried and bumped no more, as it is in clear violation of the Forum Necromancy Act of 2123 and the Prohibition of Entirely Subjective Religious Discussion Act.
I further more propose that if the conflict is not resolved or at least off the AC G/H/S front page in 10 days time that extensive carpet bombing using kitten and puppy jpegs be conducted until all thread participants cease activity under a hail of cuteness.
How does the rest of the council vote? |
I vote aye
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Darsnan
|
 |
New Syracuse, Beta Prime
Dec 2001 time: 00:13
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Senethro
I, Senethro of the Hive propose a new motion before the Chironian Planetary Council; That this thread be buried and bumped no more, as it is in clear violation of the Forum Necromancy Act of 2123 and the Prohibition of Entirely Subjective Religious Discussion Act.
I further more propose that if the conflict is not resolved or at least off the AC G/H/S front page in 10 days time that extensive carpet bombing using kitten and puppy jpegs be conducted until all thread participants cease activity under a hail of cuteness.
How does the rest of the council vote? |
I vote nay: those that forget the past are condemned to repeating it. By being reminded of the thoughts of those who have gone before us, we are given the opportunity to not repeat the same mistakes as they had done.....
Also, in reference to the "Prohibition of Entirely Subjective Religious Discussion Act" (or PESRDA? ) , why the Bureau of Uniform Legal Litigation (or "BULL") takes the stance that this argument has no legal basis, and therefore all free citizens are allowed to either choose to read and contemplate these thoughts, or not: it is their choice ....
Anyways, I've seen people dig up a lot of good stuff from the past that either I hadn't been aware of, or had saved me time from having to explore the options myself. Digging up old threads (or "Thread Necromancy") isn't a bad thing, IMO.
D
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Senethro
|
|
NO STOP THIS THREAD MUST TDIE
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
SMAX - mostly because of some annoying faults in SMAC. Though, somehow I'm some kind of fond of the music in smac.
* hey, don't take that straightjacket, it's mine
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Commy
|
 |
St. Louis, MO, USA
Mar 2004 time: 05:13
|
|
I have to say, who ever came up with the idea of montheism is a true genius...think about it...
People are stupid...especially back in time...maybe stupid isn't the right word, perhaps gullible...you see, people believed almost everything...they believed the world was flat, and they believed God existed...
Now, I do give them credit, all the evidence they had and their lack of understanding of science seemed to indicate that God really did exist, but all the same...
So now, people believe God exists...okay, so someone smart uses that to "force" people to do whatever..."if you don't do it, God will strike you down with lightning" and that sort of thing really would have worked...people believe in God, and fear it because they don't understand it...so, you add a fancy little storyline with characters in it (mostly factual), but tie it all up with God, and then you write a moral code...
Now, everyone fears God, and believes your little story of creation and whatever, and so, because of their fear, they do what God says...and if God "says" do this and don't do that, then we have a moral code that people will follow...now, all you have to do is slip in something like tithing, and not only do you have people following you, listening to you, but you have people paying you as well...
I absolutely hate Scientology, but I give its creator credit...if you want to make money, make a religion...
Last edited by Commy on 26-08-2005 at 04:51
|
|
|  |
 |
|
NanoDingo
|
|
Herts, UK
Aug 2005 time: 05:13
|
|
I haven't got SMAX yet (it's too expensive ) (and I'm too lazy to get a job...anyone wanna bop me a copy on the cheap? ), but I plan to play a couple of games with the new SMAX factions, just to see what it's like and to get a feel for the new Techs and stuff, then go back to playing SMAX with the SMAC Factions. Reason being, I think the original Factions are more "pure" - they're sort of ideological pillars, whereas the new Factions are more narrow in their agendas. Also, the new Factions (especially the Aliens) tend to over-power the old ones, or so I'm told. Either way, I wouldn't mix the two groups, else the continuity is shot to Hell - the original Factions are based upon the Unity crashing, whereas the new Factions are based upon groups created forming once Planet has been colonised. So basically, I just want the play good old SMAC with the new Techs, Facilities and so forth from SMAX.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Senethro
|
|
"continuity", "pure".
Someone translate please.
Oh, and you've been PMed NanoDingo.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
NanoDingo
|
|
Herts, UK
Aug 2005 time: 05:13
|
|
continuity
Unbroken sequential link between...things...
pure
Untainted; delusion ally idealistic; suitable for people with mild obsessive-compulsive personality disorder
quote: Originally posted by Senethro
Oh, and you've been PMed NanoDingo. |
Ooh.
- 
Last edited by NanoDingo on 26-08-2005 at 20:41
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13. Apolyton Time is 00:13. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|