 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999
time: 05:18
|
|
Doesn't have anything to do with politics. In my younger, more single days in the army in europe I may have raised the bar on getting laid 'over there' to a level that todays youth can't reach, skewing the stats you see...
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002
time: 07:18
|
|
Ah ok. So you believe a commie now?  A FRENCH commie at that..
Yes yes. I believe you when you say that the left in the US was mostly against the war because of the idea of oil grabbings and that michael moore was a figure of some caliber.
And again, I'm not saying the WMD issue is the ONLY issue in here. It was certainly a big issue. But, at the end, everyone who cries about oil, they are just doing their thing, while the ones who debate and argue that since there was no WMDs, etc etc, they have a legit argument that is good and based on real life, where as 'they jiust want the oil' is based on feelings and guesses, but it's not a fact. They just think it's a fact. But it's not a proven fact, nothing but high emotions.
Then there's the big group of combinations, who say yeah there was no WMD so now you want to steal the oil, yes?  that's a different, hybrid type of group.
What I'm saying is, WMD issue plays a huge part, the biggest one for legit arguments, which from what I have seen and heard are the majority. But then again, I skip all the oil arguments without listening/reading, because it's 89% activist debate.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18.
Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
27-04-2005 17:09
|