 |
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:19
|
|
You have stated that plasma does not form well unless in vacuum. Because of this fact, plasma propulsion does not work -- at least as a first stage -- to get into orbit.
However, how much of a vacuum is really required?
Consider an airship of dimensions about 1 mile wide and long filled with helium or hydrogen, sitting at 150,000 feet altitude in near space.
There is a fellow who claims he can get to orbit in such a vehicle. There is some research going on about airships and electrostatic atmospheric ion propulsion at DARPA (the WALRUS program, f.e., see below) of which this fellow has a small piece, but it is surmised in the experimental spacelift community that the atmospheric drag during the days-long accelleration via ion propulsion obviously would be insurmountable. Because of this, most are keeping a sort of open mind about it, but can't help but think of this fellow as a crackpot.
http://www.darpa.mil/TTO/Programs/walrus.html
http://www.globalsecurity.org/milit...raft/walrus.htm
However, if a high-thrust plasma engine were operable at such an altitude, perhaps it would be possible to gain the necessary delta-v before falling back to Earth.
Any thoughts?
Last edited by DanS on 11-05-2005 at 00:28
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:19
|
|
Yes, most plasma engine concepts are low thrust and, as such, are useless in getting into orbit.
Some concepts are high thrust, but I don't know how high of thrust is attainable as a theoretical matter.
Last edited by DanS on 11-05-2005 at 00:23
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:19
|
|
He says he will be able to get to 200,000 feet on buoyancy, but has only demonstrated 100,000 feet so far for one of his relatively primitive balloons constructed of Mylar.
It seems from what you say that the airship would have to rely on lift to counteract the drag for his system to work -- as you say, the plasma engine would not provide the adequate thrust/weight to leave the atmosphere entirely. But going those speeds in the atmosphere as you accellerate (or skipping along just above it) would seem to require a damn impressive structurally strong airship.
Bah. He's probably forgetting something.
Last edited by DanS on 11-05-2005 at 09:02
|
|
|  |
 |
|
child of Thor
|
|
quote: Originally posted by pchang
Your biggest stresses would be from vibration and buffeting. Thus, you just need a structure that is flexible to relieve the stresses. |
Hmmm so what i should be thinking is the bigger and bendier the craft, the slower it would need to travel to escape the earths gravity, and the less trauma on exit/entry it would feel? something like that?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by child of Thor
As Che asks.
By Airship i keep thinking of a Zeplin
|
Yes. A huge Zeppelin. An airship. A dirigible. The things the NAZIs built. A mile wide and long. This is the easily doable and inexpensive part. Nobody's laughing at this part of the plan, even though it's sure a lot of sewing.
quote: Wouldn't a mile long craft be exceedingly likely to break, regardless? |
No. It's doable. The WALRUS, above, is conceived as 1/5 of a mile long and is intended to operate at ground level. This would be to move military equipment worldwide in less than a week.
At great heights, as pchang points out, the air is very thin. The orbital airship is conceived as taking off from about 150,000 feet in altitude rather than from the ground, so could be built merely to survive the atmosphere at those heights.
quote:
But escape velocity and or disturbance for such a large craft.......i find it hard to imagine it would make it through the upper atmosphere intact? That exit/entry part always looks like hell for spacecraft. |
ITYM, orbital velocity rather than escape velocity. But other than that, you're repeating what I said above. The structure would have to be strong enough to withstand acceleration to orbital velocity in an atmosphere over a week-long period.
Last edited by DanS on 11-05-2005 at 19:27
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|