 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kalius
|
 |
Kriegsgewitter
Aug 2002 time: 16:20
|
|
quote: You missed it entirely.
If it were something like 1989, sure. 1999 was after Windows 98, thus, a highly dubious image. |
I still have a PC running Windows 95. Does that mean if I take a screenshot of its Time/Date Properties with today's (2005) date on it, it's automatically dubious? Additionally, I think I would have a hard time believing an image would still exist 16 years. Personally I find a Win 1.0 SS with a 1989 date on it far more dubious 
quote: That's all right, something like this would demand at least a second, independent source. |
No it doesn't. It is certainly nothing out of the ordinary. Like I said, and Asher implied, there's nothing stopping someone setting up a system with Windows 1.0 on it. Just a question of getting the relevant pieces. There'd be no real point to it, other than for a historical document, but it is certainly possible.
Really I don't see where your problem lies.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Fve Crathva
|
|
I think they should have incremented the year. January 9, 1900 would have been hilarious.
SP
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|