 |
|
Omni Rex Draconis
|
|
quote: unpalatable British testes |
YOMANK! Eating dinner while reading Apolyton is not advised...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Colon
Spiff, the function of monetary policy is to manage to business cycles, not to raise structural growth throughout the cycles, since it *cannot* do so. In the long run increasing the money stock does *not* increase real GDP, it simply decreases the value of money.
That said, it's not because there's low growth the central bank is to blame for it, there can be other factors in play. And if you look at the actual monetary conditions in the eurozone you'll find that both M3 (+6.8%) and private loans (+7.3%) are growing at a healthy pace.
Blaming sluggish growth on the ECB is just some BS excuse to avoid structural reforms. |
The ECB is not the only one responsible for the slow growth, far from it. My gripe with the ECB is not necessarily that it follows anti-inflationist policies in time of need. My gripe is that the struggle against inflation is the ultimate goal of the ECB, and a hardwired one (to vhange the aims of the ECB, the European leaders need the agreement of the ECB itself )
It may not look like it, but I'm favourable to economic pragmatism. And you can't have economic pragmatism when you carve economic policies in stone, so that it remains similar for the next 30 to 50 years. Which is what the EU treaties/constitution are doing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Colon
|
 |
Antwerp, Colon's Chocolate Canard Country
Jan 1970 time: 06:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
The ECB is not the only one responsible for the slow growth, far from it. My gripe with the ECB is not necessarily that it follows anti-inflationist policies in time of need. My gripe is that the struggle against inflation is the ultimate goal of the ECB, and a hardwired one (to vhange the aims of the ECB, the European leaders need the agreement of the ECB itself )
It may not look like it, but I'm favourable to economic pragmatism. And you can't have economic pragmatism when you carve economic policies in stone, so that it remains similar for the next 30 to 50 years. Which is what the EU treaties/constitution are doing. |
The ECB's policies are only carved in stone insofar it has to guarantee monetary stability, and in extension economic stability. The principle is that's the best way a CB can contribute to economic growth and that's a very sound principle. Far too often in the past politicians have reacted to economic logjams by letting the spigot run loose or devaluating their currency, as an easy, quick fix, with disastrous consequences.
And I repeat: monetary conditions do not appear to be loose if you look at actual date of money supply and credit growth.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|