 |
|
Atragon
|
|
Just to chime in on this discussion but I would submit that there is a huge difference between 'use (ally)'s OOB' and 'place my fleet under the control of (ally)' since the first one imposes NO RISK on you, the second one means you had damned well better trust your ally since he could (theoretically) command your fleet to attack yourself.
Big difference IMHO.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Atragon
|
|
I submit that there is a huge difference, 'use ally's OOB' still retains fleet to your orders, be they attack X, defend self, whatever... WITH THE SAME OOB AS YOUR ALLY. AUTOMATICALLY.
'ally controls fleet' on the other hand means instead of an ally attack on X for example, your (hypothetical ally) could instead redirect the fleet to attack Y or Z, decide to use a suicidal OOB for it and attack seperately, etc.
Huge difference there.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21.
Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2005 02:45
) rather then trying to send in our own OoB as we couldn't seem to get the same OoB in. It was incredibly frustrating to keep sending in orders for an allied attack only to have it fail because the OoB's didn't match exactly (iirc our "allied attack failed twice in the early game). Even more frustrating was not being sure if someone was doing it deliberately or whether it was a typo.
|