 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Winston
I did not change the meaning of it. First, it read "Because it's a scientific problem?", after the edit it read "Because searching for explanation for the origin of life is a scientific problem?". |
The Minister's position is that religion is short-changed in the evolutionary theory. So why would I not assume you were referring to religion?
Evolution isn't a scientific "problem," so why should I think you mean anything else?
quote:
The strawman remark referred to your posing the questioon "How is religious philosophy remotely a scientific problem?". I never claimed any such thing, neither before or after the edit, so that's what makes it a strawman.
|
As I said already, adding the clarification is fine. But you didn't just add the clarification, you added it and then accused me--incorrectly--of engaging in a strawman. My question about religious philosophy was appropriate given both how unclear your statement was and the fact that the Minister is explicitley asking scientists to consider religious theories. If your statement was so clear, why would you add the clarification, anyway?
But instead of saying "Wait, that's not what I meant, here's the clarification," you instead claimed I'd made a "strawman," despite it being a reasonable interpretation of the initial vague statement. That's where the dishonesty comes from. It doesn't require me being "full of myself" to point out the cheap tactic.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
My understanding is that the creationists were handily defeated during the debate before the Kansas School Board. I suspect that the same thing will happen in the Netherlands. I think it makes since to have them speak in a public forum. They will collect their arguments for presentation, allowing evolutionists an opportunity to address each and every point in detail. In the end it's better this way.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Your understanding on Kansas is wrong. Evolutionists didn't participate, they boycotted. By doing so, they insured there would be no stamp of scientific legitimacy on it. And that's exactly the impression the media got. So I'd say that's generally the best way to handle such situations. |
But the creationist "experts" lost when they were forced to admit that they had never read the materials they were criticizing.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|