 |
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrFun
It's really ignorant to simply call a country wealthy by its GDP and economic production when the wealthy of that country were a minority of elitist whites until their party was crashed with the overthrow of apartheid and unfair, exploitative land distribution that promoted mass poverty for the rest of the population. |
I think that it is pretty ignorant to think that the solution to those things you mention, is to destroy trade, industrial and agricultural production. Especially if it is done so properly that a country that before could feed themself and export food, now has to import it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
I am not sure if that is good agricultural practice.
First, planting the same crop/whatnot in a large scale is now deemed a bad thing, because a disease, parasite, or some other thing that attacks the plant will wipe a huge percentage of them out.
Second, these practices are simply not sustainable. It requires dumping more and more synthetic fertilizers into the land and the use of more and more synthetic pesticides. This stuff kills the land and gets into the surface and ground water. What fun.
It's entirely possible that this is why they are failing. |
If that was what they were doing, then you would be right, but I seriously doubt it. Not being a farmer myself, I although know that shift of crops etc are common practice and I think that the old farmers in Zimbabwe also knew this.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
While I do agree that Robert Mugabe and his government is bad and corrupt. I also believe that taking land back from whites that was basically STOLEN is not necessarily wrong or bad. It's a tough situation that the current whites did not create but benefit from. A better solution is needed that will impower the majority and the country as a whole.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kuciwalker
Pax: Americans are benefitting from lands that were stolen from Native Americans that were already there... so should we give the entire country back to them? |
Read my post. It's more complicated because of the amount of **** america stole and the fact that it would be impossible for America to fully repatriate every family member of a slave, every mexican, every indian, and every chinese person that was subjugated. So we as Americans have programs that will get these groups onto an equal footing with the mainstream. I say that's a great idea. If you read my post you will see that's basically what I'm advocating for Zimbabwe. By the way, the most christian and moral thing to do would be to give the stolen goods back.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
Maybe you're not Christian but I did consider you to be a decent man of morals with a sense of right and wrong. If I'm wrong please let me know.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kuciwalker
I also don't really see a moral obligation to return property stolen generations ago. |
What are your beliefs? For instance. Do you hate terrorists but love the inequality that causes it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
I agree. But something has to be done about the economic state of blacks in Africa. Equality is in name only if the people don't have the same social and economic opportunities as the whites in Africa.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
atomant
|
 |
Aussie, no longer lost in Africa
Jul 2002 time: 15:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Pax
I agree. But something has to be done about the economic state of blacks in Africa. Equality is in name only if the people don't have the same social and economic opportunities as the whites in Africa. |
The problem is that the new, post colonial, governments stole from the weathly (and everyone else) and redistributed the wealth to themselves. The only thing liberation did was create a class of rich black individuals, rather than a redistribution of wealth. You can't blame 25 years of economic mismanagement on one ethnic group when rampant corruption and lack of good governance is the problem.
As for South Africa not following the Zimbabwe route. Well this assumes that people actual learn from their history lessons. My example that proves otherwise is as follows: Tanzania (tried socialist principles)--> led to economic ruin. Malawi, got independence after Tanzania (tried socialist principles) --> led to economic ruin. Zambia, got independence around the same time as Malawi, (tried socialist principles) ---> led to economic ruin. Zimbabwe, got independence after Zambia (tried socialist principles) ---> economic ruin. South Africa, Dabbling in socialist principles ----> economy running good at the moment, but leading economic and social indicators point to (you guessed it) economic ruin.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kuciwalker
And so of course the solution is blanket redistribution of productive farmland from those who can work it effectively to those who cannot/will not. | I don't think the idea you're proposing is going to work kuciwalker.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
quote: Originally posted by atomant
The problem is that the new, post colonial, governments stole from the weathly (and everyone else) and redistributed the wealth to themselves. The only thing liberation did was create a class of rich black individuals, rather than a redistribution of wealth. You can't blame 25 years of economic mismanagement on one ethnic group when rampant corruption and lack of good governance is the problem.
As for South Africa not following the Zimbabwe route. Well this assumes that people actual learn from their history lessons. My example that proves otherwise is as follows: Tanzania (tried socialist principles)--> led to economic ruin. Malawi, got independence after Tanzania (tried socialist principles) --> led to economic ruin. Zambia, got independence around the same time as Malawi, (tried socialist principles) ---> led to economic ruin. Zimbabwe, got independence after Zambia (tried socialist principles) ---> economic ruin. South Africa, Dabbling in socialist principles ----> economy running good at the moment, but leading economic and social indicators point to (you guessed it) economic ruin. | I don't think that socialism is the root of the problem. I agree that good governance is the one key to solving this problem. I also think that the problem is how the countries were set up. I believe that the colonial powers set these countries up to be weak and the colonial powers also did not make enough effort to give these countries enough of there resources back to stand on their own 2 feet.
It's just like in the play by George Bernard Shaw. "In order for Britain to be #1 the status quo must be maintained." Another good book to read about post colonialism in africa is a grain of wheat by Ngugi wa Thiongo.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|