 |
|  |
 |
|
Elok
|
 |
Land of Ramen Dragons
Mar 2003 time: 00:22
|
|
www.bushisantichrist.com
I'm sure it's been listed here before now, and no, I'm pretty sure it's not intended as a joke. My question is, is this guy nuts or just eccentric? True, there are lots of equally loony theories from the religious right, but those are propagated by their entire culture. They have the mob mentality to aid in making them stupid enough to believe what they're saying. This guy seems to have come up with it on his own, and believes in it very firmly despite the fact that nobody else does. Does that constitute a schizoid delusion? Anybody here have a background in psychology?
Before we get sidetracked, I'm not saying that W. is a terribly righteous or Christian man beyond the level of lipservice. Most of this guy's criticisms of Bush seem to be spot-on in that respect. However, George W. Bush as the final Antichrist, heir to Hitler, Nero and Napoleon but worse than all of them, that's a bit much to swallow. Even if you hate Bush intensely you have to admit that he lacks several traits normally associated with Satan, such as cunning, insight into the hearts of men, persuasiveness, or basic competence. And an attention span, and strategical savvy, and so on. While I don't like Satan, I respect him as an enemy, and Bush just isn't in his league. That, and some of this guy's "proof" is just absurd. Like "BushJr" and the original German "Busche" both being six letters; either way, his name is 666! OMG!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
Couldn't bother myself reading it since the jerk failed on page one - the number of the beast isn't 666 but 616.
Anyway, since god doesn't exist, then satan/antichrist doesn't either, so it is just plain BS.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Slaughtermeyer
|
|
PA, USA
Jan 1970 time: 05:22
|
|
Bush sure has a good start -- he's responsible for the deaths of more innocent people in his first term of office than Hitler was in his first four years as leader.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
CyberShy

|
 |
Delft, The Netherlands
Mar 1999 time: 06:22
|
|
Of course Nero was the first incarnation of the antichrist.
When John was writing the book of revelations he describes the antichrist as the best that was (Nero), is not and will come.
Further is it described that the antichrist will be the 8th king. 5 kings have been, 1 is (Rome), 1 is still to come and will rule a short time. Then after that the antichrist will come.
The unidentified king (the 7th king) (king can very well mean empire as well) is unknown.
Many say that all of the 8 kings have to do with the jews. Egypt (1st king) brought the jews in slavery.
Babylon, Persians, Assyrian brought the jews in excile. The Greeks conquered their country, improved the infrastructure and brought the greek translation of the old testament. The roman in the end destroyed Jerusalem and the temple and whiped the jews into the diaspora.
If you follow that theory hitler could be the 7th king. He ruled a short time (For sure compared to those 6 'kings') and he certainly had a thing with the jews.
That would mean that indeed the 8th king, who is the antichrist, (who is out of the 6) could appear.
revelations 12 for those who are interested.
Oh, with a lot of speculation of course 
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|