 |
|  |
 |
|
Vince278
|
|
I thought atheism was basically nothing-ism.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vince278
|
|
A fine distinction, and the connotation is usually negative.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lebensraum
|
|
@ alex: good point
the declaration by marx that "there is no god" which was adopted by the soviet state is of course a theological assertion. in other words, yes, there are valid reasons for considering communism as a religion
quote: Originally posted by Vince278
I thought atheism was basically nothing-ism. |
now let's not get confused with nihilism - really more of a philosophy than a religion. nihilism is the belief that all values are baseless and that nothing can be known or communicated. basically, it denies the possibility of any kind of purpose or existence.
atheism is (arguably) less ambitious in that it only denies the existence of god. some interpretations of buddhism and taoism are quite atheist. they do not deny the possibility of meaning, order, form, knowledge or communication. you can be a perfectly good buddhist/taoist and firmly believe there is no god.
quote: Originally posted by Ambro2000 Confucianism in China is undoubtly the most important “religious/philosophical” alignment thru out history. |
and just to clear things up, my own (limited)understanding of confucianism is that confucianism is neither a religion, nor a philosophy. as i understand it, it is basically just a collection of more or less arbitrary platitudes and proverbs. there is some implied sense of a 'cosmic order,' but even the basic cosmology is very much a matter of individual interpretation.
i'm willing to be convinced otherwise, but at this stage, i see it more as a random collection of ghost stories and 'calendar quotes'
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lebensraum
|
|
@ kuci
sorry, mate, secularism is not 'a better thing to call it.'
firstly, secularism is not (in my opinion) a well defined term. different people use it to mean many different things.
secondly, in terms of government, secularism often refers to the separation of church and state. clearly, a state enforced system of atheism as implemented by the soviets is not a separation, but an identification of church and state. if anything, the soviet system is one of the least secular systems in recent history
finally, depending on who is using the term and how much they have had to drink at the time, secularism is not a form of atheism. it is sometimes used to suggest that man is better off pursuing his own improvement, rather than relying on a divine being. it does not necessarily reject the existence of god. it's kind of an official name for those who choose not to be 'god-botherers.'
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Max Sinister
|
|
France is a secular state (at the moment, they have quarrels with their Muslim citizens because the French state f.e. doesn't allow scarfs for female pupils/students in schools), but certainly not atheist. Most French have a religion (how religious they're, is another question). So Secularism != Atheism.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|