 |
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Last Conformist
I suspect an ever-widening definition of mental illness is at least partly to blame. |
In a study like this the researcher would generally send out questionnaires to the study population. The questionnaires I've seen used recently are pretty much the same as those used in the past. It is possible though that people are more accustomed to the idea of depression and anxiety and that mental illness is becoming less stigmatized. People may be more willing to reveal their problems on paper, or the fact that they have friends and family who have been diagnosed as having mental illness may make them more sensitized to the symptoms. OTOH the collective assaults of divorce, single parentage, increased competition for jobs, less job security, more drugs and alcohol, and longer lifespans may have something to do with it. Even the trend towards obesity could be a factor. Obese people are prone to have higher rates of sleep apnea, the symptoms of which may mimic depression.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
shawnmmcc
|
|
Before you conservative types go prattling on about the poor and social programs. My brother, a veteran by the way with 16 years service, was seriously injured in the military, when he was trying to turn a 300 pound patient alone (the patient HAD to be turned, and they had no staff) and the patient slipped. He seperated his pelvis from his spine - he has no feeling from the ankles down. For that he got 15% disability, and being barred, due to insurance reasons, from his area of training, physical therapy assistant.
Now his personality is pretty f**ked up. My father about once a year beat him - as in putting his head through a wall, etc - and spent almost every weekends and some weekdays telling him how stupid/useless he was. Yes, my mom would have divorced him, but by that time my sister was burned and my dad was the medical insurance. So mentally he is not in the best of shape. Financially he is marginal - he works two jobs, and can just make ends meet.
Yes, his siblings try to help out - but not everybody has four siblings, in fact that is very rare today. In addition the highest rate of poverty is among the young. So before people prattle on about the poor, chances, and fate - many people who need government help are there because their employer screwed them over and/or a pretty hideous childhood. Want the best pre-indicator for poverty, crime, drug-use, et al? Be a foster child. Yes, some get lucky and make a life from it. Statistically you are better off having a parent killed by disease or an accident during your childhood than you are if you get shoved into the foster care system.
Let private charities deal with it? Yes, Mr. Scrooge, or any other righteous character from Dickens - take your pick. Victorian England used that system, and that's just the kind of Christian country we want the United States to be in the 21st century. The number of poor, especially when you factor in problems with housing, etc. is actually on the rise. While, if the conservatives are to be believed, Bush is presiding over an economic boom. For whom, I might ask? Is it a boom that increase inequities in a country, instead of decreasing them?
Oh - to correct anybody who posts on Food Stamps - it was A MILITARY PROGRAM initially. To make sure we had more potential draftees, as many were unqualified during WW2 due to poor childhood nutrition. I always laugh at Food Stamps as a liberal program. Learn some history, and discuss how it transmorgified, but don't blame the liberals, this was a military program at inception. 
edited to clarify a sentence and delete a "he"
Last edited by shawnmmcc on 08-06-2005 at 19:57
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lawrence of Arabia
heres another interesting figure - ancient greence, who handed out no government assitance to the poor, had less inequality then today: the richest athenians made only 2.5 times more then the poorest. |
Yes, those ancient Greeks did a great job self-regulating their multi-national corporations and complex global secutities, commodities and fx markets. Why doesn't the SEC simply emulate their ancient Greek counterparts? I also hear their medical insurance providers have yet to be equalled, and the natural libertarian goodness of all Greek doctors meant you could get a free or low cost MRI at any Athenian or Spartan clinic.
But even better than the ancient Greeks were prehistoric cave dwellers. In the average band, Grog the Chief only had one more sharpened stick than the poorest member of the tribe, so clearly we should model our societies after these near perfect examples.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
shawnmmcc
|
|
Dracon, many historians believe that Theodore Roosevelt, with his anti-trust and government regulatory agencies promoting food safety, etc. actually did more to prevent the rise of strong communist and socialist movements in the United States.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by shawnmmcc
Before you conservative types go prattling on about the poor and social programs. My brother, a veteran by the way with 16 years service, was seriously injured in the military, when he was trying to turn a 300 pound patient alone (the patient HAD to be turned, and they had no staff) and the patient slipped. He seperated his pelvis from his spine - he has no feeling from the ankles down. For that he got 15% disability, and being barred, due to insurance reasons, from his area of training, physical therapy assistant.
Now his personality is pretty f**ked up. My father about once a year beat him - as in putting his head through a wall, etc - and spent almost every weekends and some weekdays telling him how stupid/useless he was. Yes, my mom would have divorced him, but by that time my sister was burned and my dad was the medical insurance. So mentally he is not in the best of shape. Financially he is marginal - he works two jobs, and can just make ends meet.
Yes, his siblings try to help out - but not everybody has four siblings, in fact that is very rare today. In addition the highest rate of poverty is among the young. So before people prattle on about the poor, chances, and fate - many people who need government help are there because their employer screwed them over and/or a pretty hideous childhood. Want the best pre-indicator for poverty, crime, drug-use, et al? Be a foster child. Yes, some get lucky and make a life from it. Statistically you are better off having a parent killed by disease or an accident during your childhood than you are if you get shoved into the foster care system.
Let private charities deal with it? Yes, Mr. Scrooge, or any other righteous character from Dickens - take your pick. Victorian England used that system, and that's just the kind of Christian country we want the United States to be in the 21st century. The number of poor, especially when you factor in problems with housing, etc. is actually on the rise. While, if the conservatives are to be believed, Bush is presiding over an economic boom. For whom, I might ask? Is it a boom that increase inequities in a country, instead of decreasing them?
Oh - to correct anybody who posts on Food Stamps - it was A MILITARY PROGRAM initially. To make sure we had more potential draftees, as many were unqualified during WW2 due to poor childhood nutrition. I always laugh at Food Stamps as a liberal program. Learn some history, and discuss how it transmorgified, but don't blame the liberals, this was a military program at inception. 
edited to clarify a sentence and delete a "he" |
Too bad most of the public wealth redistribution takes from the rich and gives to the rich. The elderly account for the vast majority of this largesse while they are the wealthiest age group. Children are the most likely to live in poverty, yet they receive peanuts in comparison.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Odin
I think a good sized chunk of people who call themselves "conservatives" are not really conservatives, but communitarians, people who are to the left on economic issues and on the right on social issues. They vote Republican only because of social issues; God, gays, and guns as I like to say. This is why I think the Republicans are so dangerous, they are waging cuture wars to distract these people from the things that would encourage them to vote for people who would help them economically. If social issues magically became irrelavent the US would take a big lurch to the left economically.
Edit: the word wrap is acting weird. |
My nightmare has already occurred, namely both parties committed to deficit spending and expanding the welfare state when we don't even have a realistic chance of paying for the one we already have. The social issues are great for politicians, as what they do is almost meaningless. Any real attempt to do anything on social issues is immediately (and rightfully) shot down by the courts.
So I agree that as the Republicans became the plurality party they have become more to the left economically. Where I disagree is that this isn't something that is coming down the pipe, it's already happened. Your commie fantasies are going to remain fantasies.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
Closest that I have personally seen is a threat to attack our display with knives so that they would be able to cut our signs, and to make use of superior numbers in order to trash the signs and intimidate our volunteers. I personally broke the story to the campus paper, which forced the pro choice group to repeal their earlier statement and issue an apology.
There have been numerous instances of violence at our display, and fortunately, while I have not been present, they have been well documented. The latest one happened in Calgary, where pro choicers attacked and ripped up one of our displays. |
Did those displays have your signs saying that women who get abortions are the same as Nazis and the Khmer Rouge?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|