 |
|
Hydro
|
|
Winfield, IL, USA
Jun 1999
time: 05:34
|
|
I just posted my votes for the August Apolyton HoF at the official thread for:
Darsnan
buster
smacksim
Gents - you deserve it!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
spartak
|
|
what the heck.
Darsnan
Smacksim
Hydro.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000
time: 22:34
|
|
They probably just want the plus one
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000
time: 22:34
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Illuminatus
Ummm Flubber, the two sentences are not related. |
edited -- "he" will need the support
Obviously Darsnan is one of the biggest contributors on here and as such needs the SMAC community to support him . The people that get elected more quickly seem to be those that spend some time in OT, probably being controversial, apart from doing something is some other forum
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000
time: 22:34
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Cataphract887
well i got two of them 'stickied' in that case.
if we all do not want them to be zeroed we should coordinate voting so only one person votes for each smacer on that list,then the rest of the people concentrate votes to get more in,at which point they only get 1 vote\election and we concentrate on another person.i suppose in that manner we could dominate the chart,assuming i understand how this works(prevoiusly have ignored these) |
There are probably not enough Smacers active to "dominate the chart" as other larger communities on this board have their favorites as well. AS for getting "zeroed"-- it wouldn't bother me-- I have a few votes but realistically haven't done enough to warrant the HoF (although I do appreciate the 1-3 people that feel otherwise).
I pretty much feel the same way about other folks that face zeroing-- Anyone that could see that happen probably isn't going to make the Hall anytime soon and I don't really see the point of a dedicated campaign to keep people on the list once they happen to get a vote.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000
time: 22:34
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Illuminatus
You still don't get it - I was talking about the other three getting support from elsewhere, not Darsnan. I am sorry, it was probably bad phrasing on my part. I'll edit my post to make it more clear. |
I might get it.
My point about Darsnan is that since he is so focused on SMAC, he really needs the support of the SMAC community to get ahead.
AS for others that lead Darsnan, I assume that they are viewed as good candidates because they make contributions to other parts of the board as well as Smac. In many ways, I could see why people with a presence across the entirety of Apolyton could be viewed as "more deserving" or whatever but I like to vote for SMACers as a way to give them a small bit of recognition
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Cataphract887
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Flubber
There are probably not enough Smacers active to "dominate the chart" as other larger communities on this board have their favorites as well. AS for getting "zeroed"-- it wouldn't bother me-- I have a few votes but realistically haven't done enough to warrant the HoF (although I do appreciate the 1-3 people that feel otherwise).
I pretty much feel the same way about other folks that face zeroing-- Anyone that could see that happen probably isn't going to make the Hall anytime soon and I don't really see the point of a dedicated campaign to keep people on the list once they happen to get a vote. |
i realize we do not have numbers but if only 1 vote is needed to sustain a person and every single other vote goes towards electing a single other person in,we could have alot,compared to the adhoc voting of less organised forums.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000
time: 22:34
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Cataphract887
i realize we do not have numbers but if only 1 vote is needed to sustain a person and every single other vote goes towards electing a single other person in,we could have alot,compared to the adhoc voting of less organised forums. |
I agree BUT I just don't see the point of SUSTAINING someone on the list just for the sake of sustaining someone-- If you think they are deserving, sure send them some votes but I would never vote for someone solely so they could avoid being zeroed.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Cataphract887
|
|
you dont think most of the smacers on that list that are getting 0 are not worthy? tau ceti,kody...they seem like people id expect to see on the hall of fame.
im not advocating sustaining just for the sake of sustaining.just that theres more worthyness then capability. and if we worked together we could boost our capability
isnt that the whole point of this thread as originally posted?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hercules
|
 |
in Tir Na Og
Sep 2002
time: 05:34
|
|
Does Petek not deserve some acknowledgement for his advice to newbies to the forum and Smacx, when they have difficulties getting the game installed and to work.
He always seems to be there to do this.
Last edited by Hercules on 31-08-2005 at 01:00
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34.
Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
18-06-2005 07:45
|