 |
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
High tax cuts for the rich meant less money from federal grants to state goverments for state run programs....
Programs(which include things like education!) once started NEVER dissapear so state goverments need to make up the revenue so state goverment and local community goverments.... say it with me.... so they RAISE taxes.... which come out of you wallet, John Q American.
When I try to explain this to people I don't get any sort of rebbutal, I just get a blank stare or "No... that can't be" without any sort of logical rebbutal.
*grummble*
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
HEY who cares? We can spend 275 bil to invade a foreign country for no gain for ourselves!
Why is it that people can not understand the concept that we have to actually generate revenue for all the money we spend?
It does not MATTER how much you want to spend it and how you justify that it is worth while..... we are now tremendously in the hole, even worse then before.
I'd love to see some figures on budget short falls between various presidents, hard to find that info though. I bet Bush might win.
Aren't republicans supposed to be fiscal conservatives? OH that is only with their own money.... not ours, gotcha. We gotta pay this 275 bil back.......
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kidicious
|
 |
Diety of Kidiverse
Mar 2003 time: 21:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Vesayen
High tax cuts for the rich meant less money from federal grants to state goverments for state run programs....
|
I didn't know federal grants were cut.
edit: Quick research shows a $10.7 billion decline. That's not anywhere near the federal tax cuts.
Last edited by Kidicious on 10-06-2005 at 00:54
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|