28-06-2005 09:02									#1
	How much do you care about shared victories? Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

Just interested in what the team sentiment is and figured I'd start an opinion poll. BF has gotten a little heated at the UN about it, and it's probably time to see just what the team opinion is.

	28-06-2005 09:06									#2
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Whoops, forgot to revise the second line when I decided against differentiating between current levels of activity. Just read that as "I'd still lurk, but no way I'd be active"

Edit: You know what? Close this poll. I'll start a new one.

	28-06-2005 17:43									#3
	Got spare money?

Personally, as a team member of GoW who did win by a shared victory in the PTWDGI, I feel that all this fuss about it is an insult to me, my team mates and those from ND.

I will not vote or post in any damn "shared victory" thread except for this post.

Move on.

	28-06-2005 19:45									#4
	Inflate your Upload Space

I need an option "it's too bad, but I'd still play" or something along those lines.

	29-06-2005 00:25									#5
	Put an end to popups!

quote: Originally posted by Donegeal Personally, as a team member of GoW who did win by a shared victory in the PTWDGI, I feel that all this fuss about it is an insult to me, my team mates and those from ND. I will not vote or post in any damn "shared victory" thread except for this post. Move on.

Very well. Since it's already been done in one DG, I suppose we should just stop talking about it and have it be in this one by default. I do not understand why you are upset by "damn 'shared victory'" threads discussing whether we want to see them in this game.

As for these threads, I started this poll after BF posted this at the UN:

quote: Originally posted by BigFree quote: Originally posted by BigFree I would go so far as to say that ACS would likely not participate in a game in which a "fair and balanced" start was NOT afforded each team. Does anyone expect a 100% balanced map simular to a checkerboard? Nope. I apologize to those that could not see that the contradiction contained in my post was likey an error of a missing word. I've FIXED it now so that there is now no longer any confusion. I wish I could say I share the same "highest confidence" that F-P has that a "fair, reasonable" map will be created. If my posts seem "unreasonable and heated" to others I'm at a loss because I do not see how they could be contrued that way. Another topic ACS would like to make a point on is that we would not be happy at all with a situation that allows for a game with shared victory conditions. We would like a game that, under no circumstances, would NOT have more than one winner.

While he did not repeat his ultimatum about shared victories, it's still pretty strong. Before we say that "we would not be happy at all" I wanted to see if it actually mattered to much of the team, likes and dislikes aside. If it doesn't, posters at the UN should not go around ranting should shared victory be in. If it does matter, well, perhaps we should.

quote: Originally posted by BigFurryMonster I need an option "it's too bad, but I'd still play" or something along those lines.

Check the version 2 poll.

	29-06-2005 07:18									#6
	Support Apolyton

I think that a shared victory (in this game, at least) is a cop-out. I also think that we will need to break up CGN/CDZ at any cost, especially if they try to accept CBR into the fold.