28-06-2005 09:07									#1
	Shared Victories Opinion Poll, take 2 Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

Just interested in what the team sentiment is and figured I'd start an opinion poll. BF has gotten a little heated at the UN about it, and it's probably time to see just what the team opinion is.

Take 2 with better options.

	28-06-2005 09:59									#2
	Increase the size of your Attachments

Changed the vote options, who cares? Game on!

	28-06-2005 10:07									#3
	Suffering from ads?

I don't really give a RAT's A$$ either way, we will still be the superiour Power, when all is said and done.

So, we have to wait until we can NUKE the rat ba$tartds, we will win this shigdig.

E_T

	28-06-2005 10:31									#4
	Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

Personally I want this to be a best-site-wins competition, that means NO shared victories.

However, if for some reason they are allowed, it doesn't mean we actively have to win by shared victory, but we must be on the lookout for any two teams that are too close throught the game as it might be a giveaway.

	28-06-2005 11:14									#5
	Suffering from ads?

sounds like a job for both our FAM and Intel teams.

E_T

	28-06-2005 22:51									#6
	Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

IMO, shared victories should not be allowed under any circumstances.

	29-06-2005 00:18									#7
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

quote: Originally posted by Master Zen However, if for some reason they are allowed, it doesn't mean we actively have to win by shared victory, but we must be on the lookout for any two teams that are too close throught the game as it might be a giveaway.

And hope hope hope that everyone else thinks enough of themselves to want to win alone?

Come on. We're a good team, yes, but not that good. In a shared victory game we'll need an ally, just like everybody else.

	29-06-2005 01:12									#8
	Get a bigger avatar today!

I'll just say this here as Donegeal won't see it:


Shared victory, if preceded by good gameplay, sucks, IMO;

Shared victory, if knowingly sought from the beginning, brings my respect for those people down to the level I reserve for Lucky.

	29-06-2005 05:57									#9
	Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

quote: Originally posted by Krill Shared victory, if preceded by good gameplay, sucks, IMO; Shared victory, if knowingly sought from the beginning, brings my respect for those people down to the level I reserve for Lucky.

I second that.

I have not voted, but to be honest, I suspect I would simply leave. To think you are playing a losing hand from the start because 2 (or why not 3) sites had agreed in advance to a victory, well, utter krap in my opinion.

You know - and now I am even more pi$$ed with the way the ptwdg ended given the precedent which was set.

	29-06-2005 06:10									#10
	Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

btw - can you direct me to where this specific UN discussion is. I have registered at Evolution Games and perused the ISDG threads there, but it is all very, well, civilized. Not much heated debate.

	29-06-2005 10:11									#11
	Inflate your Upload Space

It's contained in this thread Beta:

http://www.evo-games.net/Home/viewtopic.php?t=830

I'd like to see the simpler proposal go to MRex soon.

	29-06-2005 11:08									#12
	Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote: Originally posted by Beta I have not voted, but to be honest, I suspect I would simply leave. To think you are playing a losing hand from the start because 2 (or why not 3) sites had agreed in advance to a victory, well, utter krap in my opinion. You know - and now I am even more pi$$ed with the way the ptwdg ended given the precedent which was set.

No teams in the ptwdg started with a losing hand in anything other than crappy terrain.