 |
| |
|
|
Vesayen
|
|
EXCEPT that their ruling did not make such a distinction.
There was nothing in the ruling that said that it can't target against a specific individual-it only mentions that the goverment has a right, via eminent domain to take someones property, giving them "market value" for it, for the purpose of economic enchament.
This is in Mass., the most liberal and sane(There is north east liberalism that believes in things like compassion, equality, charity and justice and west coast liberalism like California, i.e.-insane) state in the country, if the town goverment is indicative of the rest of the state, they will surley pass this proposal, just to spite him.
Why not? They didn't have anything in the ruling that it can't be targeted against an individual..... what is he going to do if he dosen't like it, bring it to the supreme court?
Oh wait....... 
In my nightly prayers, I will include a prayer hoping for sucess in this.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Vesayen
|
|
It does not matter Michael, all they need is the town goverment to make a completley arbitrary decision. Really the only way they could be stopped from doing this by external pressure would be to impeach them.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
mrmitchell
|
|
quote:
The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the "Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged." |
Hotel goes bankrupt on printing fees.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21.
Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
29-06-2005 01:28
|
|