 |
|
Kalius
|
 |
Kriegsgewitter
Aug 2002
time: 16:21
|
|
Ok... it's that time or year again... who's the better cyclist? Eddy Merckx or Lance Armstrong?
Last edited by Kalius on 02-07-2005 at 06:38
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Zopperoni
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Maniac
Eddy Merckx |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BlackCat
|
|
I'm not sure, but I think that it's a competition about who are the best to shave their legs.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
mrmitchell
|
|
Eddie could have personally saved an orphanage from a burning building but it doesn't change what makes Lance better:
He practically rose from the dead. He had like negative 3% chance of surviving cancer, and bam! 6, pretty soon 7 Tour de Frances!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000
time: 06:21
|
|
Eddy wasn't doped.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
alva
|
 |
Republic of Flanders
Sep 2001
time: 06:21
|
|
Ok, gotta ask, of those of you who voted Lance, has ever watched a cycling race (not live, just on TV).
Last edited by alva on 03-07-2005 at 04:28
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21.
Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2005 06:30
)
|