 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
The costs actually werent so much if you think that such costs as new metro extensions, tram lines, a rather attractive Athens facelift and a brand new bridge in.... Peloponese were included. |
I was actually thinking along the same lines. You can't just look at an outlay/direct revenue comparison, you have to factor in lasting improvements that may have been done to facilitate the Games. Granted, not every place gets all or even any of these benefits, but if they do come, they can mean a lot. I look at Vancouver's upcoming 2010 Winter Games, for example. For it, they are going to build a new rapid transit line from the airport to downtown, improve the highway to Whistler and redevelop part of south False Creek. These are all things that need to be done badly and have been talked about for years, but would never have actually happened had they not gotten the kick in the ass in the form of the Olympics. Once the Games are gone, these things will still be around and very useful.
Similarly, Toronto's failed 2008 bid called for a massive redevolpment of completely derelict port lands. Once they lost the bid, all these plans were shelved indefinitely. It would have been a huge benefit to the city as a whole if these improvements could have been made.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
So let's say you love a girl right?
And you are in love with her.
So if she goes nag nag nag all the time she is dizzying your eros. That goood feeling
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kontiki
I was actually thinking along the same lines. You can't just look at an outlay/direct revenue comparison, you have to factor in lasting improvements that may have been done to facilitate the Games. Granted, not every place gets all or even any of these benefits, but if they do come, they can mean a lot. I look at Vancouver's upcoming 2010 Winter Games, for example. For it, they are going to build a new rapid transit line from the airport to downtown, improve the highway to Whistler and redevelop part of south False Creek. These are all things that need to be done badly and have been talked about for years, but would never have actually happened had they not gotten the kick in the ass in the form of the Olympics. Once the Games are gone, these things will still be around and very useful.
Similarly, Toronto's failed 2008 bid called for a massive redevolpment of completely derelict port lands. Once they lost the bid, all these plans were shelved indefinitely. It would have been a huge benefit to the city as a whole if these improvements could have been made. |
Perhaps the redevelopment of the port lands wasn't worth it in the first place and that's why it wasn't done. I agree that a profit/loss shouldn't be the only factor to look at, but it's a very good place to start in orienting your thinking. Using the olympics as an excuse to misinvest public funds doesn't seem like a good way of governing. Likewise, if the investment is a good one, you shouldn't need the olympics in order to make it happen.
(This is coming from someone who is supportive of infrastructure spending generally.)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
Perhaps the redevelopment of the port lands wasn't worth it in the first place and that's why it wasn't done. I agree that a profit/loss shouldn't be the only factor to look at, but it's a very good place to start in orienting your thinking. Using the olympics as an excuse to misinvest public funds doesn't seem like a good way of governing. Likewise, if the investment is a good one, you shouldn't need the olympics in order to make it happen.
(This is coming from someone who is supportive of infrastructure spending generally.) |
In Toronto, it's way more complicated than something being "worth it". We have had so much bureaucratic gridlock over the port lands, it's rediculous. The area is controlled by a motley assortment of municipal, provincial (I think) and federal agencies and no one seems to want to work with anyone else. Add in to the mix the issue of what type of development. There has been a commission set up for a number of years on how best to develop the land, but every interested party keeps changing their mind. Not to mention that Toronto has a history of brutal development and a completely impotent planning board. The Olympics would have forced all the parties to come together, put a plan in place (they had one) and take action on it. Now that there's no time constraints (and no venues to be built) , everyone wants more out of their piece of the pie with less responsibility.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|