 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
because what these world needs
is more of older men with money and knowledge of the world, to prey on young women..
and I would expect that there is some (but not as much) the other way as well
as what happened here.. (But I would have been happy to tap that at 14)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
I agree, there is a huge difference between having sex with a 7 yearold and having sex with a 14 yearold
one is not OK because of power issues, and how we (as a culture) treat people as kids until they are 18 (or older)
the other is no OK period
JM
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
actually, females reach sexual maturity before males..
and are generally more mature
18 or 16 is a good age, I think, expecially with culture as it is (where parents take care of their kids sometimes until their kids are 30)
JM
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by St Leo
Age of consent has more to do with judgement than sexual potency. Our culture overencourages males and underencourages females when it comes to sex, so teenage males are likelier than teenage females to do stupid things when the age of consent is lowered to include them. Sex is good all around, but immature individuals are likelier to do stupid things like risk stds and pregnancy. |
and have emotional trouble
which is something that so many seem to ignore..
the (wo)man who gets into a bad relationship when young could hvae their future relationships colored by that
besides the years being emotionally exploited and the like
while it happens to people of all ages, it happens far more to the young
JM
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pyrodrew
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ajbera
It's the defense attorney's job to do whatever it can to avoid or minimize penalties for the client. A tactic like "she's just too gosh-darn pretty to go to jail!" may be stupid, but it's valid for their purpose. Logic and emotions are often both utilized, by both the prosecution and defense. Juries are weird, they just may buy it. |
Valid maybe, but stupid is right. Jury members Ms. Plain Jane or Mrs. Ugly Hag would more likely hear, "you 2 are ugly enough for prison, but not my client." And some other jury members might find it insults their intelligence. It has more potential to backfire than anything.
It seems more likely he said that to the reporters after the hearing just for publicity. That's hardly the only emotional tactic, much less a good one. And perhaps he's clueless, attorneys can be weird too.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ajbera
Well, the same is true of voting, it's a system that's open to most people, regardless of intelligence, wisdom, bias, etc. At least with juries there are attempts to mitigate some of this, but often unsuccessfully. One of the disadvantages of a democracy, I suppose. |

Do you really think that you have a problem with hopeless voters in US ? Unless I'm wrong, then you are in that lucky situation that only 60 % of your voters is active - try to figure out what hell we have here where 80-90 % of the voters use their rights !!!
Actually, it 's pretty hard to elect a government based upon those that know better under such circumstances.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|