 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000
time: 22:37
|
|
Ouch
So what happens if people don't pass-- do they get a retest. If you fail 3 times are you sterilized?? If I don't get a licence ( and wouldn't qualify) what happens if I impregnate someone with stellar qualities by any measure? Does she have to turf me to keep the child??
I wish that many parents were better than they are but I don't see how you can test for it. I'd also be afraid what that test could look like depending on the area. here I am thinking of what boards or what not could come up with if hijacked by the lefties or the righties. I can see some lefties telling all the execs at Walmart or Exxonmobil that they are unfit while the rigties could set barriers based on marriage or various religious beliefs
Ouch ouch either way
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37.
Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
20-07-2005 01:10
)
Awfully bad idea. There's already a "child care" institution (don't know how you call it in English) that should evaluate parents' ability to raise their children in case of doubt, and act if parents are not able to raise their children. Even if there are problems, those institutions are more likely not to act in minor cases because the alternative - asylum - is nothing better. The system is not perfect, but no system is.
I never said anything akin to faith based institutions, (On the contrary, I believe that religion should be a choice that the child makes, rather than imposed on them through sunday school/etc.) and I don't mean morality akin to a Good Christian American (tm). Still, I can see where you object to this.
|