Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Civilization III > Civ3-Conquests Democracy Game > Victory conditions
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!
CivGroups
C3CDG Euphorica (7): Not a Member - Join
C3CDG Blood Oath Horde (17): Not a Member - Join
C3CDG Team Babylon (16): Not a Member - Join
C3CDG The Lost Boys (12): Not a Member - Join
C3CDG Ankh-Morpork (8): Not a Member - Join
C3CDG Desolation Row (6): Not a Member - Join

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread    < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
1889 is offline 1889

King
Limbo
May 2004
time: 22:37
  Old Post 20-07-2005 05:05
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
Victory conditions Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote:

quote:
You have to see that if two teams, unbeknownst to the other teams, have decided to "share" victory from the outset, then it would be very likely that the "team" of teams would win.

Now, if everyone was aware that "shared" victories were allowed then teams would just join with other teams till you had either 1v1 or 1v1v1 depending on the number of Civs in the game.

If everyone plays with the idea that only one team can be the winner it will change every teams philosophy versus allowing "shared" victories.



This compares to a 'we kill each other last' agreement. Which is different in that you do have to prepare for the eventuality, and it may drastically alter who you take to the final two with you. Whether you care for the show or not, "Survivor" is not a bad analogy, other than of course, you don't have the other teams sitting on the sidelines to make the final vote as to who wins; but it is similar in that you want to take someone with you think you can eventually 'beat'. That is the fundamental difference.


So you only want conquest victory now? I don't remember any of this being mentioned when we set up the game.

Krill is offline Krill
Emperor
On a cold wet rock, in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.
Dec 2003
time: 05:37
  Old Post 20-07-2005 05:18
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

Conquest, Domination, Diplomatic, Spaceship, Cultural, and Score Victories should be allowed. However, I have yet to see a demogame won by any except "Conquest"


What Some, and most of us detest is when two (or more) teams band together, and make a pact basically stating that they will kill everyone then they will declare themselve joint winners. They say that everyone else is dead, and so they don't matter. This has already got to the level where some members have refused to take part in current demogames, with a possibility it will spread to future games.

1889 is offline 1889

King
Limbo
May 2004
time: 22:37
  Old Post 20-07-2005 05:29
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

Well whats the fuss about PTWDG then? That was a UN victory.

Krill is offline Krill
Emperor
On a cold wet rock, in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.
Dec 2003
time: 05:37
  Old Post 20-07-2005 05:30
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Have you read that forum?

1889 is offline 1889

King
Limbo
May 2004
time: 22:37
  Old Post 20-07-2005 05:39
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

Not after I saw the UN victory. Would you care to summarize?

skrobism is offline skrobism
King
USA
Oct 2000
time: 23:37
  Old Post 20-07-2005 05:48
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#6 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Who is quoted and what is this about?

Krill is offline Krill
Emperor
On a cold wet rock, in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.
Dec 2003
time: 05:37
  Old Post 20-07-2005 05:55
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#7 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

No. I do not want to reopen that wound, as it is pretty deep, even for me, and was not part of that game for long (only about 15 months). Surficed to say, you will rip this community into 2 completely separate pieces, with much hate, for a long time. You can go and read the Whore of babylon threads, the Game discussion thread from about post 390 onwards, and when the private forums are opened, you can read them.

And it it Beta is quoted above.

skrobism is offline skrobism
King
USA
Oct 2000
time: 23:37
  Old Post 20-07-2005 06:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#8 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

Thank you. I figured it out when I saw it in the other thread. No need to go down that path.

Ljube is offline Ljube
Emperor
Belgrade
May 2003
time: 06:37
  Old Post 20-07-2005 07:22
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#9 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

Shared victories not allowed. All other in game victories allowed.

Beta is offline Beta

Deity
Prowling in a PBEM near you!
Nov 2002
time: 00:37
  Old Post 20-07-2005 07:46 Visit Beta<br><a href=/members><img src=/forums/images/lifer-icon.gif border=0></a><BR>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#10 Report this post to a moderator
Re: Victory conditions Put an end to popups!

quote:
Originally posted by 1889

So you only want conquest victory now? I don't remember any of this being mentioned when we set up the game.


1889 - I have no problem whatsoever with any team winning this game by any of the standard and accepted civilization victory conditions. And yes - technically the PTWDG was eventually settled by a UN victory. But if you take the time to read the threads, you will see the game was decided by two teams forming a 'shared victory' alliance unbeknownst to the other teams - either that they had done it, or that it was even possible to consider it. (Trip's responsible for the latter. )

So, a spaceship win or a UN win is more than possible. I thought I saw a large gantry tower yonder.

Beta is offline Beta

Deity
Prowling in a PBEM near you!
Nov 2002
time: 00:37
  Old Post 20-07-2005 07:47 Visit Beta<br><a href=/members><img src=/forums/images/lifer-icon.gif border=0></a><BR>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#11 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

quote:
Originally posted by Krill
No. I do not want to reopen that wound, as it is pretty deep, even for me, and was not part of that game for long (only about 15 months). Surficed to say, you will rip this community into 2 completely separate pieces, with much hate, for a long time. You can go and read the Whore of babylon threads, the Game discussion thread from about post 390 onwards, and when the private forums are opened, you can read them.



Right on! Well said Krill.

PLATO is offline PLATO

King
Of the occupied South
Dec 2002
time: 23:37
  Old Post 20-07-2005 08:41
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#12 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

Shared victory was never a consideration of the Horde. Fear not! We want it all!!

McMeadows is offline McMeadows
King
right here, right now
Mar 1999
time: 06:37
  Old Post 20-07-2005 16:20 Visit McMeadows's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#13 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

A shared victory wasn't in my mind either.

As both nations (BOH-EU) were very much interested in getting to chivalry as fast as possible, a tech alliance was not all that uncommon. A mil alliance vs DR was agreed upon later. Reasons have been explained. As far as I felt personally, we (EU) were to end the alliances peacefully after we would have erased DR from the game (together).

I do not support a shared victory.

planet is offline planet
Warlord

May 2005
time: 05:37
  Old Post 21-07-2005 05:43 Visit planet's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#14 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

quote:
Originally posted by PLATO
Shared victory was never a consideration of the Horde. Fear not! We want it all!!


That much no one in along the pacific rim doubts.

ChrisiusMaximus is offline ChrisiusMaximus
Emperor
Staffordshire England
Jul 2002
time: 05:37
  Old Post 21-07-2005 11:01
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#15 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

snoopy369 is offline snoopy369

Emperor
Of the Peanuts Gallery
Apr 2004
time: 23:37
  Old Post 21-07-2005 11:40
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#16 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

As I posted in the other forum, I completely agree with Beta and Krill, especially after seeing PTWDG(1). There was a clear alliance with the voiced (internally) intent of a shared victory, which is horrible and wrong. The Betrayers and Euphorica never had an agreement of such nature, and the only side to suggest it was the BOH - whom has now of course betrayed such an alliance anyways. I think this game is safe from shared victories

Rubychaser is offline Rubychaser
Prince
Range Rover
Dec 2003
time: 16:37
  Old Post 21-07-2005 11:59
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#17 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

Did you spill your milk this morning? Or have you never played a demo game before?

Aqualung71 is offline Aqualung71
Emperor
Lord Desolator of the Desolation Row, C3CDG
Oct 2002
time: 12:37
  Old Post 21-07-2005 13:54
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#18 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

Just for the record, though it should be fairly obvious....the Desolation Row has never, does not currently, nor will it ever, support shared victories.

Moonbars is offline Moonbars

King
Glasgow
Aug 2002
time: 05:37
  Old Post 21-07-2005 14:38 Visit Moonbars<br><a href=/members><img src=/forums/images/inmate-icon.gif border=0></a><BR>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#19 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

lol, shared vicotry with who??

One of the three teams that plotted our destruction in secret, in what I cannot see as much better that the shared victory everybody is so worked up over?

Or perhaps with one of the two "neutral" countries - one of whom has just declared war on the Horde, and so claims to neutrality ring rather false, or with the other neutral team, who we learn has been spying and intelligence gathering on our nation, and selling the information to our enemies?

Yes I think we can be sure DR isn't in any game-long shared victory type situation

ormuzd is offline ormuzd
Moderator

Jan 2003
time: 07:37
  Old Post 21-07-2005 18:37 Visit ormuzd's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#20 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

very well spoken but the game is long and "never" is the most promising lie anyone could tell

Kloreep is offline Kloreep

Emperor
of the pillow
Jun 2002
time: 00:37
  Old Post 21-07-2005 19:42
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#21 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote:
Originally posted by Moonbars
One of the three teams that plotted our destruction in secret, in what I cannot see as much better that the shared victory everybody is so worked up over?


Ah, but it was merely an alliance, not one to shared victory. This game demonstrates the difference very well: since you're going to be competing against your alliance partners eventually, there's motive to break it.

Ljube is offline Ljube
Emperor
Belgrade
May 2003
time: 06:37
  Old Post 21-07-2005 21:14
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#22 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

Indeed. You Babylonians sold our alliance for the price of one tech.

snoopy369 is offline snoopy369

Emperor
Of the Peanuts Gallery
Apr 2004
time: 23:37
  Old Post 22-07-2005 09:27
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#23 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

Had BoH not betrayed us this past 2 turns ago, all three members would have had Feudalism this past turn.

Aqualung71 is offline Aqualung71
Emperor
Lord Desolator of the Desolation Row, C3CDG
Oct 2002
time: 12:37
  Old Post 22-07-2005 11:33
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#24 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

Perhaps you had better look at your diplo screen again snoop

Paddy the Scot is offline Paddy the Scot

Prince
Hordeland
Mar 2001
time: 14:37
  Old Post 22-07-2005 12:04 Visit Paddy the Scot<br><a href=/members><img src=/forums/images/inmate-icon.gif border=0></a><BR>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#25 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote:
Originally posted by snoopy369
Had BoH not betrayed us this past 2 turns ago, all three members would have had Feudalism this past turn.


oh well then I wonder why the Lords of the Horde are building castles all over the shop

maybe they know something you do not

then again, our medieval infantry are already marching your way, so you should know soon enough

Attachment: germanic castles.jpg
This has been downloaded 35 time(s).

snoopy369 is offline snoopy369

Emperor
Of the Peanuts Gallery
Apr 2004
time: 23:37
  Old Post 22-07-2005 17:40
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#26 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

My statement is no less true for you having feudalism now.

Paddy the Scot is offline Paddy the Scot

Prince
Hordeland
Mar 2001
time: 14:37
  Old Post 22-07-2005 17:51 Visit Paddy the Scot<br><a href=/members><img src=/forums/images/inmate-icon.gif border=0></a><BR>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#27 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

I will have to take that matter up in one of our new courts.

These castles are a little too new to be damp and mouldy yet

  < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37.
Apolyton Time is 00:37.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0614 seconds (89.78% PHP - 10.22% MySQL) with 61 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net