 |
|
flash9286
|
|
quote: I'll try to find statistics on country of origin for Wal Mart products... |
Despite a well-publicized "Made in the U.S.A." campaign, 85 percent of the stores' items are made overseas.
http://www.pbs.org/itvs/storewars/stores2.html
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
quote: Depends upon what you mean by "supporting domestic jobs." That PBS documentary mentioned early has a portion where a guy who lost his job when Wal Mart stangled Rubbermaid is looking for a new job. The only company in town that is hiring is Wal Mart, which is paying half what he used to make a Rubbermaid.
Wal Mart has been successful in a large part because it has succeeded in holding down or driving down salaries of both itself and its suppliers. Lower salaries means a lower standard of living.
It's called the WalMartization of America and its corroding away our middle class.
(See the above post on the stagnation of the standard of living from American workers since the 1970's!) |
Yes, but 100 million Americans shop at Wal Mart every week, and they get on average 4-5% lower costs on all those basics they buy that make up such a huge portion of their spending. As Wal Mart expands (which they will), they will eliminate the inefficiency in every business they enter, and more Americans will be able to afford more stuff.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
It's not bad news for everyone...you know what? Murphy Oil (located a convenient short drive from me, it seems a lot of walmarts suppliers are arkansas buddies) has the contract for every gas station in front of a Wal Mart Supercenter or Sam's Club. It is a huge boon for them. They have entered the big leagues.
Don't cry foul about Wal Mart and Rubbermaid. Rubbermaid violated the number one rule of business: Don't piss off the customer. It's true if you're a retailer or a manufacturer.
EDIT: quote: 50% lower salaries to buy 5% cheaper stuff. Do you see the problem. |
No. Not everyone in the whole nation is losing their jobs to more productive methods, but everyone in the nation is benefitting from lower prices. Even if 0.1% of Americans (doubtful) have had to take 50% pay cuts because of Wal Mart, 100% of Americans can take advantage of the discounts, and it is a huge benefit to those lesser affluent when it's all added up.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JohnT

|
 |
Capitalist
Mar 1999 time: 00:37
|
|
You tell them to **** themselves. You have a responsibility to your shareholders and there's no need to conduct business if it doesn't bring profits. Hell, in order to keep your job, it's the only response possible.
Honestly, people, the complaints about Wal-Mart are nothing new. Again, these same issues have popped up regarding Sears, Penneys, A&P, Kroger, Home Depot... damn near every successful retailer in existence. There's nothing in this thread that's original, including the fear that "nothing can stop them." Standard Oil was stopped, and that was a monopoly with far, far, far, far, far, far, far greater power, influence, and market penetration than Wal-Mart could even begin to hope to dream of wanting to achieve. Capice?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jonny
|
 |
Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Nov 2000 time: 23:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Zkribbler
POP QUIZ:
You're the CEO of Rubbermaid. Your No. 1 customer, Wal Mart, has just demanded price concessions which will, in effect, turn over all your profits to Wal Mart. What do you do? What do you do?? |
Unfortunately, that is a all too common situation for Walmart's suppliers.
My aunt was a representative for Hanes/Playtex, and she absolutely hated going to Walmart headquarters in Bentonville simply because they could pretty much get what they wanted in negotiation, as their purchase would make up a good fraction (say 30 or 40 percent) of the company's production, and there were no other customers for such a huge amount of product.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
quote: including the fear that "nothing can stop them." |
Who said my attitude was fear? I see it as a goal.
quote: POP QUIZ:
You're the CEO of Rubbermaid. Your No. 1 customer, Wal Mart, has just demanded price concessions which will, in effect, turn over all your profits to Wal Mart. What do you do? What do you do?? |
They won't turn over profits to Wal Mart, they'll pretty much eliminate them altogether. And like JohnT said, if it's not profitable, Rubbermaid CEO should tell Wal Mart, "go screw yourselves." I always thought in business it wouldn't be worthwhile to sell things at a loss, as it is...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JohnT
You tell them to **** themselves. You have a responsibility to your shareholders and there's no need to conduct business if it doesn't bring profits. Hell, in order to keep your job, it's the only response possible.
Honestly, people, the complaints about Wal-Mart are nothing new. Again, these same issues have popped up regarding Sears, Penneys, A&P, Kroger, Home Depot... damn near every successful retailer in existence. There's nothing in this thread that's original, including the fear that "nothing can stop them." Standard Oil was stopped, and that was a monopoly with far, far, far, far, far, far, far greater power, influence, and market penetration than Wal-Mart could even begin to hope to dream of wanting to achieve. Capice? |
While I agree with your general statement, Standard Oil was stopped by the government's breakup of the company .
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
Wal Mart won't just go and raise all its prices for profits sake even when it has 90% of the retail market. They know that all they have is low price, and anyone else could come in and pull the rug out from under them if they got lazy.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|