 |
|  |
 |
|
Senethro
|
|
I have little doubt that ICS will live forever. If its not 1-square spacing it'll be 2.
Also, whats the problem with the colonisation rush? Has any civilisation ever prospered by sitting back on its laurels while other more acquisative civs expand their resource gathering base? It sounds to me like some "Perfect Builders" have had their beautiful landscaped empire spoilt by a colour clashing rival Civ because they forgot what game they were really playing.
With the lack of corruption and riots I suspect it might be the case that you'll get ICSs (or a continually repeating unit of blanket terraforming mathematically worked out to be the most beneficial) across the whole map.
Personally, I'm in for the Civics.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Senethro
|
|
Hence why it will be chosen!
(SMAC style B-drones ftw)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The_Aussie_Lurker
|
|
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
May 2001 time: 05:37
|
|
Personally, I am looking forward to the new Civics and religion systems, a much better diplomacy and trade system (fingers crossed) and AI civs with distinct personalities. Oh, and a curbing of the Snowball effect which does not rely on a broken corruption system.
Yours,
Aussie_Lurker.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Senethro
|
|
You guys are wishing that 1+1 != 2. Unless some serious changes are made to base facilities in the order of doubling their effect while halving their mineral cost then horizontal expansion will always be (initially) greater than vertical expansion.
Colonisation used variants of Golden Ages/We love the X day to encourage vertical expansion with the highest version of these giving +2 of each resource per tile. I wonder what we're going to see in Civ 4 if anything...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|