 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by dannubis
eum...
because russia, china and france don't have any bases on foreign soil right now from which they are asked to leave ?
on second thought, france may still be present in ivory coast,... oh well...
the US has no need for bases outside of Afghanistan. the war in that country is over, didn't you know ? 
like i said, it's easy to have suddenly high moral values when you have next to nothing to lose over the issue. some people would pride themselves in it. other would be appaled by the hypocrisy of it. |
Russia has extensive presence, including troops in many former Soviet states. China has growing relationships with, among others, Burma, Zimbabwe, etc.
France has extensive ties with Francophone africa, including currently a troop presence in Cote D'Ivoire.
There is still Taliban activity in Afghanistan. The base in Uzbekistan has also been used to provide humanitarian supplies to northern Afghanistan.
I am appalled by the hypocrisy of those who scan the world for American misdeeds, and ignore American actions that contradict their idees fixes about America.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by dannubis
i am not saying anything about the international politics on display here. i, just as much as you do, hope that this forgotten region finally gets some prosperity and peace.
but i have serious questions about the motives of your governement if i consider their unconditional support for the likes of Musharaf.
so, please no more : "look at us, we are willing to give up an insignaifacant base in the middle of nowhere that we do not actually need anymore over a human rights issue", while supporting a military dictator in one of the largest countries in central asia. |
1. Musharraf isnt as oppressive as Karimov. Pakistan had parliamentary elections, in which multiple parties, some opposed to Musharaf, won plenty of seats. Nothing like that in Uzbekistan. Also Pakistan has a fairly vibrant press, IIUC, which Uzbekistan does not have. Also Musharrah hasnt done any massacres of peaceful protestors lately, that i know of, as Karimov is accused of.
2. Our support for Musharraf, far from being unconditional, is conditioned on support for the hunt for AQ in Pakistan, something of importance to the entire world, not just the US. We also support furhter political reforms in Pakistan, but I think its quite reasonable that we hold that less important than musharrafs actions against AQ.
3. If the US is taking measures on human rights that others are not, its proper to recognize that, and not to complain that we havent been perfect in dropping our support for dictators, while others rush to support dictators.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|