 |
|  |
 |
|
Rufus T. Firefly
|
 |
is one way of saying it, though I prefer "mensch"
Sep 2000 time: 07:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ming
That would be their choice... And at least it would be that... a choice! We do have a choice in this country, so the comparisons are silly at best. |
Yep, that's the big difference. It breaks down to three related questions:
1) Is there a prevailing orthodoxy regarding one's way of life? In the KSA, yes, absolutely; in the US, not really.
2) Is the prevailing orthodoxy enforced at the point of a gun? In the KSA, yes; in the US, no.
3) If you differ from the prevailing orthodoxy, can you escape it without hiding who you are? In the KSA, no; in the US, sure -- just move to a place (San Francisco, the Bible Belt, an ex-urb, etc) where your way is accepted.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Geronimo
|
|
st cloud USA
Jan 1970 time: 05:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Why does anyone take the question seriously?
Last time I saw a guy in a Camel, was, well, NEVER. That alone shows how different the two places are. |
maybe because they are taking a different question seriously than the one you are objecting to? The OP has already been clarified to refer to differences between the ability of ordinary citizens to change what their governments do rather than the exceedingly broad and silly question that the thread title suggests.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Proteus_MST
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Viceroy
Actually, I think you've hit upon a interesting point Proteus, I have noticed that for some, democracy appears to mean getting your own way all the time, and that somehow when this is not acheived, democratic credentials are brought into question.
The fact is, No country that I am aware of has a system of government which entitles its people to take a vote on every policy (including going to War) .. You simply get the chance to vote on a government every so often, and you have the opportunity to take into account all the actions of that government when you make your choice at the next election.
I wonder if a government that only took decisions based on referendum would ever be truelly representative of the people ? |
I think Switzerland has a government with the strongest resemblance to direct democracy.
A lot of things on local and national level in Switzerland, including new laws seems to be decided by referenda. (including the famous idea, to make it mandatory that goods in Switzerland are transported by train instead of trucks).
But switzerland is a small country with a very homogenous population (as they have very strict laws concerning immigration),
so things implemented in switzerland may be more difficult to implement in larger states.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|