 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:37
|
|
One of the guys in my class in school got 94% on his final exams (2nd in the year, of 320ish people) and is a two time olympian.
I have competed at national level in basketball and rowing, and have also done a PhD at Cambridge University.
I don't wear glasses.
So i guess you're not the only one.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Al'Kimiya
|
|
You will all soon find out that green-eyed men are underrepresented in the area of eyeglass-wearing, how is that for superiority?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
quote: Also, the association smart = weak is false. I know at my (geek) school, we have the best athletics in the area. Just not in sports like football or basketball - we're better at individual sports like swimming and track and tennis. |
Yeah, but how many people care about what you're better at?
Track is probably third to football and basketball in terms of care...tennis and swimming are getting on down there...
Maybe the thing your school is really exhibiting is that, since team sports like football and basketball are sucked at, no one at your school is good at teamwork skills?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
did u know that all serial killers had 20/20 vision?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
No, it's just simple logic.
1. There are only so many hours in a day
2. Time spent doing one thing couldn't be used for something else
Which means a person can either spend his time to excel in academics or athletics, but not either.
Thus, if in an area where a bunch of self-professed geeks could best students in the same age group from other schools in the same area in athletics, that just means all those other kids are total waste products. |
Just because you couldn't do both (or any?) of them doesn't mean other people are similarly equipped to handle things. I finished with an A-level equivalent of AAAA in my school exams and played 30ish hours of basketball a week as part of my semi-professional club (which was national champion when I played there) and the U18 national side. Admittedly Luxembourg, but still.
Same goes for the other guy i mentioned, he swam 2.5 hours before school, then 2 hours after school as well and 2*2hrs hours training sessions on Sat/Sun. He finished with one of the highest averages ever seen in my school, maths olympiad medals and has represented his country in Sydney and Athens.
Or take Oxford and Cambridge rowers. Admittedly some get in because they happened to row for the US/Canada/Britain/Australia/German Olympic team, others come in as undergraduates and manage to combine a full degree with 35hours of training for one of the hardest single sporting events.
It's all a question of time management and having brains to start with. I could do the school work that would take most people an hour in 15-20mins. Why? I trained myself to speed read, and developed a form of photographic memory. Also, at school i did not do an awful lot else but school and sport really. I did not watch TV to any great degree, played some computer games but not a lot and maybe went out with other friends once every two weeks. It is just what you decide to do.
I also think rowing is a sport that is ideally suited for this, as a lot of the training is done in the early morning when most people would be sleeping anyway. Your body gets used to sleeping less, so you can do more in a day.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|