 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
what I said was mentioned in some article I think..
not sure of its basis, or even what it was refering to
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
I have heard (*from somethingawful) that united way spends twice as much on admin overhead as red cross..
now I don't know about how much each brings in..
JM
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rufus T. Firefly
|
 |
is one way of saying it, though I prefer "mensch"
Sep 2000 time: 07:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
Spinned off from the "Promoting Red Cross Donations" thread
che mentioned the American Red Cross has a corruption problem and the Quakers are better. Jon pointed out the ARC has "only" a 20% corruption (which I took to mean that 20% of the donations is used for non-essential things internally).
Are there any studies on this? Or perhaps more generally, percentage of donations that are actually used for stated purposes. |
Ask, and ye shall receive:
The US Federal government sponsors an annual chartity drive, the Combined Federal Campaign. As part of that capaign, they put out this brochure, which lists thousands of charaties, gives a description of each, and then shows their administrative costs as a percentage of total revenue. For example:
quote: 0700 American Red Cross (202)303-4546 www.redcross.org EIN#53-0196605 - A humanitarian organization, led by volunteers, to provide relief to victims of disasters and help prevent, prepare and respond to emergencies. 9.9% |
So according to this, the Red Cross spends just under 10% of its revenue on administration and fundraising. United Way spends slightly less -- 9.6%. World Vision clocks in considerably higher, at 14.1%.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|