 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
The Daily Show just showed a clip of asshat-extrordinaire Tom Coburn doing a crossword puzzle during the hearing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Solomwi

|
 |
Don King of the Apolyton HLA Movement
Dec 2002 time: 23:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by asleepathewheel
Cool. That's in Birmingham, right? If I were your rebel classmates, I would definately lay low this time of year 
So I take it you're in your first weeks of law school? That first year is a pain in the ass, but 2nd and 3rd year were a blast, for me anyway.
I wish I knew where I would be practicing in 3 years. I'll be in Indianapolis for another year and a half and then who knows where, my wife finishes her phd in 2007 and we will relocate, and take another bar :grrr: |
Right on Birmingham. First day of orientation, when we were all dressed up for pictures, I happened to sit next to a guy in a bowtie and white shirt at lunch. We introduced ourselves and he mentioned that he was from Ole Miss. I told him I had already figured that. 
First weeks, indeed, and I'm enjoying it so far, but definitely seeing the pain in the ass factor. I keep hearing that about 2nd and 3rd year. Can't wait. 
It helps immensely that we have quite a bit of Strikeresque talent in the class, too.  
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Adam Smith
|
 |
Maryland, USA
Jan 1970 time: 00:37
|
|
COLUMN by David Broder in Sunday's Washington Post. Broder is probably the most respected US political columnist today, and a life-long Democrat.
Roberts's Sterling Showing
By David S. Broder
Sunday, September 18, 2005; Page B07
The question of whether Judge John Roberts is qualified to be chief justice of the United States has been rendered moot by his performance in the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings. He is so obviously -- ridiculously -- well-equipped to lead government's third branch that it is hard to imagine how any Democrats can justify a vote against his confirmation.
.....
Finally, he said, his recent judicial service has deepened his sense of humility. "Part of that modesty has to do with being open to the considered views of your colleagues on the bench. I would say that's one of the things I've learned the most in the past two years on the Court of Appeals: how valuable it is to function in a collegial way . . . other judges being open to your views; you being open to theirs. They, after all, are in the same position you're in. They've read the same briefs. They've heard the same arguments. . . . If they're seeing things in a very different way, you need to be open to that and try to take another look at your view and make sure that you're on solid ground."
This is so far from the caricature of a conservative ideologue depicted by some of the interest groups that their attacks seem absurd.
.....
Roberts's only problem is that he has set a standard so high, it will be difficult for the next nominee to measure up.
If the Democrats are smart, they will not bow to their interest groups but instead will embrace this extraordinary nominee and challenge President Bush, who has at least one more vacancy to fill, to "send us another Roberts."
And today from CNN
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The senior Democrat on the Judiciary Committee announced Wednesday he will vote to confirm John Roberts for chief justice of the United States after leading lawmakers met with President Bush to discuss candidates for the other high court vacancy.
....
Moments after Leahy spoke, Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts, who also serves on the Judiciary Committee, announced he would vote against Roberts.
"There is clear and convincing evidence that John Roberts is the wrong choice for chief justice," Kennedy said. "I oppose the nomination, and I urge my colleagues to do the same."
Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, who lost the presidential election to Bush last year, also planned to announce his opposition to Roberts' confirmation on Wednesday.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SpencerH
|
 |
Co-Ruler of my patch of land south of Birmingham Alabama
Feb 2002 time: 23:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Adam Smith
COLUMN by David Broder in Sunday's Washington Post. Broder is probably the most respected US political columnist today, and a life-long Democrat.
Roberts's Sterling Showing
By David S. Broder
Sunday, September 18, 2005; Page B07
The question of whether Judge John Roberts is qualified to be chief justice of the United States has been rendered moot by his performance in the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings. He is so obviously -- ridiculously -- well-equipped to lead government's third branch that it is hard to imagine how any Democrats can justify a vote against his confirmation.
.....
Finally, he said, his recent judicial service has deepened his sense of humility. "Part of that modesty has to do with being open to the considered views of your colleagues on the bench. I would say that's one of the things I've learned the most in the past two years on the Court of Appeals: how valuable it is to function in a collegial way . . . other judges being open to your views; you being open to theirs. They, after all, are in the same position you're in. They've read the same briefs. They've heard the same arguments. . . . If they're seeing things in a very different way, you need to be open to that and try to take another look at your view and make sure that you're on solid ground."
This is so far from the caricature of a conservative ideologue depicted by some of the interest groups that their attacks seem absurd.
.....
Roberts's only problem is that he has set a standard so high, it will be difficult for the next nominee to measure up.
If the Democrats are smart, they will not bow to their interest groups but instead will embrace this extraordinary nominee and challenge President Bush, who has at least one more vacancy to fill, to "send us another Roberts."
And today from CNN
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The senior Democrat on the Judiciary Committee announced Wednesday he will vote to confirm John Roberts for chief justice of the United States after leading lawmakers met with President Bush to discuss candidates for the other high court vacancy.
....
Moments after Leahy spoke, Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts, who also serves on the Judiciary Committee, announced he would vote against Roberts.
"There is clear and convincing evidence that John Roberts is the wrong choice for chief justice," Kennedy said. "I oppose the nomination, and I urge my colleagues to do the same."
Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, who lost the presidential election to Bush last year, also planned to announce his opposition to Roberts' confirmation on Wednesday. |
I watched a large chunk of the hearings. Aside from omitting a comment about what complete and utter fools some Dem's on the committee have made of themselves, nothing more needs to be said.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|