 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
I've just started reading it. I know many of you have read it? It got a little bit complex on page 2. Should I pursue reading or quit?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
OK, I'll keep reading.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:37
|
|
Added to list at Amazon, seems to be cool. Haven't made the purchase yet, though, still not certain about it.
More pros!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
This is one book that all quasiintellectuals recommend to each other. It was bound to be recommended to me sooner or later, but now I worry if mathematics will be too difficult.
By the way, it pays off just to refresh knowledge about Escher's work. I'm going through some galleries right now. Very nice.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
I've got into it 20 or 30 pages now. He explains Goedel's work now. I've donwnloaded Goedel's theorems and proofs and don't understand them at all. Should I:
1) Invest time to grasp the basics of number theory and understand the proofs
2) Proceed reading with a vague understanding of Goedel's work
3) abandon the book as too difficult?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
Civman2000, that's probably what I'm going to do.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
By the way, the proof is not supposed to be hard, proofs are usually obvious when you read them and easy to comprehend. But I don't know the theory within which the proof is done, I don't understand the notation used, so I'll skip it... not with an easy heart though. Goedel's theorems are essential in this book. I'm trusting you that the author does a good work explaining them in language.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lul Thyme
|
|
Quebec, Canada
Aug 2000 time: 05:37
|
|
I have a math background and also suggest option 2.
I read the book maybe two years ago, thought it was good, though got maybe a bit bogged down and repetitive in the second half. Second half should have been condensed a bit...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
123john321
|
|
quote: Originally posted by VetLegion
(...)THE MU PUZZLE(...) |
we did this last year in math class, for factoring...
give you an answer later
|
|
|  |
 |
|
123john321
|
|
MII
MIIII
MIIIIII
MIIIIIIU
MUUU
MU
Did I get it right?
EDIT: Crap, its wrong
I quit, because I'm tired...
quote: Originally posted by VetLegion
Here is my progress: I think I have made some important insights into the MU puzzle, namely, that it can't be solved because the operations allowed are not sufficient 
I'll keep at it for a while. After I solve it, and I hope I will, I'll make a computer program to solve it, for exercize. |
I think your right....
Last edited by 123john321 on 16-09-2005 at 07:06
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DaShi
|
 |
The Taste of Japan
Sep 2000 time: 05:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
Incorrect. If you in fact bothered to read both spoilers, instead of trying to grind an axe, you would have noticed that there is an additional piece of information in mine. |
Yes, obviously gleamed from IW work. You could have at least given him some credit.
Last edited by DaShi on 18-09-2005 at 10:14
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Urban Ranger
|
|
Apolyton Duke of Off-Topic
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DaShi
Yes, obviously gleamed from IM work. You could have at least given him some credit. |
At least you admitted that you have an axe to grind and you failed to read the spoilers carefully.
That's a good start.
BTW, tell me, how could an additional piece of information be found in the original? AFAIK, "additional" is a rather elementary word.
Last edited by Urban Ranger on 16-09-2005 at 21:21
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|