 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
No, it really isn't, because the two are intertwined. It takes courage to challenge folks, and say, why treat me different from everyone else? Why can't you love me in the same way?
I don't know if this makes any sense to you, but it is something that is really important to me. |
Im not sure we're connecting. Im near sighted, and may have a touch of ADD, but those are invisible limitations, and so not really relevant. I will instead discuss something trivial, but I hope it makes the point.
I have a receding hairline. I would be tremendously outraged if I was excluded from a job for that reason, even if some resources had to expended (for whatever reason) to accomodate me. Or if I was considered a lesser person.
I do not expect however, that statues of nude men include bald men, or even men with receding hairlines. I can accept that standards of beauty wrt to physical perfection dont necessarily include me. I can be pleased (though im not sure I am) that Lucian Freud paints bald, nude men. But I dont see a need to put those on a plinth in the center of a city, and I dont think that those who might object to it are dehumanizing me.
Human beings should not live lesser lives because theyre not beautiful - just as they shouldnt because theyre physically challenged. Thats a truth I agree on. I dont see that it follows that either A. all standards of physical beauty are false, or dehumanizing or B. standards of physical beauty have no bearing on art, in particular on nude art, in particular on nude public art.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:37
|
|
quote:
Im not sure we're connecting. Im near sighted, and may have a touch of ADD, but those are invisible limitations, and so not really relevant. I will instead discuss something trivial, but I hope it makes the point.
|
Ok, some would say mine is invisible, other then the fact that I have to wear hearing aids. However, I must say that one of the biggest compliments people pay is when they say they forget that I can't hear. The loss affects things more in close relationships, then it does other ones. I can empathise somewhat to the difficulties that other folks face in approaching someone else who doesn't face these difficulties, and asking to start a relationship with them. It's hard. Most folks have certain ideas of what they want in a partner, and none of them say physical disability.
quote:
Human beings should not live lesser lives because theyre not beautiful - just as they shouldnt because theyre physically challenged. Thats a truth I agree on. I dont see that it follows that either A. all standards of physical beauty are false, or dehumanizing or B. standards of physical beauty have no bearing on art, in particular on nude art, in particular on nude public art.
|
These are separate issues I feel. First of all, standards of beauty are reinforced in the images in which we see in art. It isn't so clear cut as to say, that art represents the current standards, so much as it can also influence them.
Secondly, when you say there are standards for physical beauty, that is a huge question. What would those standards be?
Thirdly, is it necessary for public art to conform to the generally accepted norms for beauty? I find it difficult to see why you would wish to defend the norms of current society, when it tends to run contrary to more traditional forms.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
Thirdly, is it necessary for public art to conform to the generally accepted norms for beauty? I find it difficult to see why you would wish to defend the norms of current society, when it tends to run contrary to more traditional forms. |
there are subtle ways of effecting change, and not so subtle ones. A nude in wheelchair, who looked conventionally beautiful. A quadriplegic, with a conventionally beautiful face, but not nude. Heck, just something pointing out that Nelson is physically challenged and still dashing and heroic. Combining a quadriplegic, who is nude and is also pregnant, and isnt conventionally beautiful those factors apart, is NOT an attempt to gradually shift attitudes. It SEEMS 9(rightly or wrongly) like an attempt to shock the public - and while such shock is one function of art, its problematic for public art.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|