 |
|  |
 |
|
Sir Og
|
|
Lurking in Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
Jun 2001 time: 07:37
|
|
I started a game in EU2 as Bulgaria (edited the scenario files so that I can start as Bulgaria)
I am not sure how well I am doing so far. I am in 1457 and so far only managed to take Dobridja and Rumalia from the OE. I took control of Macedonia several times but when negotiating peace with the OE i don't have the optin to ask for that province (I guess that is because this their capital).
So my first question would be: is it possible to get a province that is the capital of a country.
The other thing that is not quite clear for me is how do i conquer countries. I have an idea how to do it by diplomacy although in my game my afforts to Diploannex Serbia have failed so far.
My next questions are: in your experince how much bigger than the target country (number of provinces and military) should I be in order to successfuly diploanex a country. And how do I conquer a country by war?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Nikolai
|
 |
Bergen, Norway
Oct 2000 time: 06:37
|
|
1.) You can't get a province with a capital in it without annexing the whole country. And then, as you probably know, you'll need the rest of the country taken in another war first. But how did you get the Ottoman capital in Macedonia? It's not supposed to be there, I suspect your modding must have altered more than just the availability of Bulgaria. BTW, why modding it in? You got the way to play as them explained in the other thread, what went wrong?
2.) To conquer contries, you must occopy their provinces. Then you can ask for some of them(you'll seldom have enough victory points to ask for all of them) in return of peace. Usually you can only be certain of their acceptance if you ask for maximum 50% of your VP value, the exceptance being 99 and 100%. Only when you have conquered a one province minor(f.ex. OE after some wars of yours? ), you can military annex a country. For diplomatic annexation, you must have a vassal for +10 years(preferably 20-30, never less than 15 usually), be in an alliance with it, have +190 in relations and share a land border with them(straits are treated like land borders). Also keep in mind that your king's diplomatic value vs. your target's will affect.
For your lasts questions(except the one(s) I answered above), the size is not very important if you wait 30 years, then you'll almost certainly succeed, but it's hard to get a country to become a vassal militarily if it's bigger than you, except if you have some luck/is very skilled. It's possible though. But to get a vassal by dilomacy, try getting some treaties, alliance is a must of course and try to be militarily supreme. Exactly how big you must be vs. your target I don't know.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sir Og
|
|
Lurking in Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
Jun 2001 time: 07:37
|
|
I had to modify the files because after i released Bulgaria it was missing in the list of countries when I loaded the save game.
The Ottoman capital was in Macedonia by default (Adrianopolis). There are only two provinces in the Southern part of the Balkan peninsula. Macedonia (OE capital) and Thrace (Byzantium capital).
Serbia have been my vassals for 10-15 years. I should wait some more I guess.
I have one more question. It seems to me that I am doing really bad as far as income is concerned. I have income of less than 100 ducats per anum. Is this normal for a country with three provinces only and ~60k population.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sir Og
|
|
Lurking in Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
Jun 2001 time: 07:37
|
|
One more question. If i have controll of all provincess of a country (100% VP) do I have 100% chance to annex them or they can refuse to be annexed (like they do in diploannexing).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Nikolai
|
 |
Bergen, Norway
Oct 2000 time: 06:37
|
|
If OE has their capital in Macedonia and not in western Anatolia, there's something wrong. And yes, do wait some time with Serbia.
Your income is fine, you're not big and you are positioned in a fairly rich part of the world. But how big is your army? And are you finding your military at 100% during peace? If so, it would be a good idea to lower it to 50% in peace time(if you don't have revolt risk >0 that is). Your army should not be above the supply limit if you can afford not to. In a war against OE, you might want to forget that for a while, but not too long.
As for your second question: If it's a one province minor, you are almost certain to get acceptance, if not they are allied to a powerful power who also is in the war against you. But you do also get 100% if you occupy all of a multi provicial enemy's provinces, and them you can't annex them. You are in a good position though, and can demand anything as long as you're not over 100% and get their acceptance. But also here can you get into problems if you are in a war with a powerful ally of your target.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sir Og
|
|
Lurking in Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
Jun 2001 time: 07:37
|
|
OE's capital being in Adrianopol is hstoricaly accurate. The capital was there before they captured Constantinople.
BTW there is an event in the scenario files to change the capital to Constantinople if OE conquers Byzantium.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sir Og
|
|
Lurking in Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
Jun 2001 time: 07:37
|
|
Yes but it was Bulgaria who conquered Byzantium in my game 
If the Turks had managed to capture it before me then the event was going to be triggered.
My army is ~40k men. Supportable size is 11k. I also inherited a fleet of 20 ships from my annexation of Byzantium. I have disbanded the galleys though because I don't need such a big navy at this point.
Another thing about my game is that my research is auful. I am currently researching 3-rd level techs and some of them are going to be ready after more than 50 years. This seems very strange. I remember that when I started the research they were going to be ready sooner. I have only changed government settings to reduce the research cost not to increase it but still it is awfull. This realy sucks because I think that research is the only way to accuire tech. I cannot steal or trade tech right?
Last edited by Sir Og on 20-09-2005 at 01:35
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sir Og
|
|
Lurking in Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
Jun 2001 time: 07:37
|
|
LOTM can you explain then what is the difference between a pagan country and a country that has adopted one of the majour religions. What is the difference between the Aztec empire and some lousy European kingdom that controls the equivalent of two provoncess for example. What is the logic behind being able annex the huge Aztec empire that has sophisticated government administration and not being able to annex a small European kingdom that berely stays together even if you have full control over it.
The only reason for not having so much annexations of whole countries during that period was that rarely the agressor had control over the whole territory or for dyplomatic reasons.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|