 |
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by reds4ever
I've been trying to dig them up, and going off at very intesting tangets whilst failing to find them. |
Well, here's a start. For at least one reference design, I'm partly right (leaving aside the fact that these are only the costs to NASA doing it the NASA way, not to a rational organization trying to be economical). This is a slide from June of this year...
http://images.spaceref.com/news/200....budget.lrg.jpg
The Rosetta Stone...
You get the $104 billion by adding up "Total ESMD Avail Budget" through Fiscal Year 2018. The particular reference design that they are plotting in this slide is unknown and totals $158 billion through Fiscal Year 2018. The question is begged of what happened between this reference design was plotted in June and Monday's announcement to get the total costs down to what's available through FY 2018, $104 billion.
The rocketry portion of the architecture is under "CLV" (I assume the Crew Launch Vehicle for the Crew Exploration Vehicle) and "CaLV" (the follow-on super-heavy launch vehicle), or about 40% of the costs for the program to get to Mars. Lots of miscellaneous stuff is probably put in here that's not strictly rocketry-related.
Last edited by DanS on 22-09-2005 at 02:16
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Joseph
Carter wanted peace in the world. |
I always knew he was a pervert. I'll bet he used to secretly dress up like a Miss America contestant in his bedroom.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sandman
|
 |
Sinister Penguin
Aug 2001 time: 05:37
|
|
You're ignoring a clear pattern here, Rufus.
At some point, he's going to proudly announce his intent to take America back into orbit. Or sub-orbit.
quote: So maybe you could park the spaceship in Earth Orbit instead and use the lunar base to process oxygen and fuel components which you then send back to earth orbit via an automated cargo spaceship. |
Why? It'd be cheaper to send up fuel and oxygen from Earth than build a moonbase. Less environmentally damaging as well.
Last edited by Sandman on 22-09-2005 at 11:21
|
|
|  |
 |
|
shawnmmcc
|
|
Better yet - capture a small comet or asteroid and put it into earth orbit. I would prefer the small comet myself. Use a robotic mission with a nuclear engine using the material of the comet itself for reaction mass.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|