 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
yin26
|
 |
This space reserved for Darkstar.
Apr 1999 time: 14:37
|
|
LOL! 
First, if it matters, I won't be buying Civ4 upon release. If it isn't clear what the typical pattern is in the industry (with few exceptions) about releasing half baked games and then charging you again for finished code with an expansion pack, then what can I say?
As for what I have done since Civ3, the answer is obvious: I've stopped blindly believing in a game simply because it has Sid's name on it. The guy has put Firaxis on auto-pilot and is cashing in on his fame. O.K. Fair enough. The guy probably deserves it. But smart gamers should also be critical of what happened with Civ 3...and I continue to be critical. Yes, this annoys some people (of course the fanboys but also the Peter Pan-type player who just wants to believe in the magic), but it's also an important role in the community, like it or not.
So, back to this topic:
For anybody willing to join in on this project, even if you detest my criticisms, one thing is for sure: I will keep my promises. And I'd like to expand on the deal here, Markos:
A] If I find that game relies on city sleaze and has dull combat as always, I will still do the review but will then ship back the game to you, at my expense. Then the next person on your list can have the copy.
B] If the game is really oustanding, in addition to the review, I will eat portions of the box -- on video if we can work that out.
Finally, and this might sound strange coming from me, this entire process of anticipating, criticising/hyping a game like this is all part of the fun. I realize that on the surface I seem to take things too seriously, but the truth is that computer games are a diversion -- nothing more. If Civ 4 tanks, there will be more great games than any of us can hope to play with anyway. So lighten up, people! 
By the way, truth be told, a review from Vel would almost certainly offer far more intricate analysis of inner game workings than what I would produce. Certainly I'd do my Review Machine thing as before, and I'd give the straight deal for people sitting on the fence, but I have to say that if the goal here is a nearly Ph.D.-like review of a game and NOT watching perhaps Civ4's most notable critic eat a game box, well, then, the game should go to Vel!
Last edited by yin26 on 22-09-2005 at 16:26
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dale
|
 |
Sir! Why do you keep clicking on me?
Dec 2000 time: 15:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by yin26
... *snip* ....
As for what I have done since Civ3, the answer is obvious: I've stopped blindly believing in a game simply because it has Sid's name on it. The guy has put Firaxis on auto-pilot and is cashing in on his fame. O.K. Fair enough. The guy probably deserves it. But smart gamers should also be critical of what happened with Civ 3...and I continue to be critical. Yes, this annoys some people (of course the fanboys but also the Peter Pan-type player who just wants to believe in the magic), but it's also an important role in the community, like it or not.
.... *snip*....
|
What have you done? NOTHING! You've *****ed, moaned and complained, but I haven't seen a half decent idea to try and fix the issues you point out.
Your arguements thus lack meaning because of this lack of thought. Sure, you were a hit before Civ3, but since then I've seen nothing but chest-beating and 13-year old "mummy" cries.
Also, your attempts to put down a game that isn't even released yet are clear examples of self-advertisment.
Sorry dude, but to a lot of people you're just an old burnt-out windbag. 
Dale
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
yin26
|
 |
This space reserved for Darkstar.
Apr 1999 time: 14:37
|
|
LOL! Ahhh, feelings hurt?
Poor little Dale is working so hard slaving away for the genre and it's Yinny who is getting offered a free copy of the game? Tell you what, I'll send you an autographed copy of some underpants I just soiled laughing at your hilarious public confession.
NOTE: I just noticed Dale even has something about me in his signature! Christ. Listen, we'll never have a relationship, and --no-- I won't come visit your house to teach you how to play Civ, either.
NOTE 2: Also from Dale's signature:
quote: Games Programmer for hire...... |
Maybe you should actually spend your time trying to get that job rather than crying about broken dreams on Apolyton? Just a thought.
Last edited by yin26 on 22-09-2005 at 17:18
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Locutus
|
|
ACS CTP1/2 Manager & Civ4 Co-Manager
|
 |
Hengelo, The Netherlands
Nov 1999 time: 06:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by yin26
I've stopped blindly believing in a game simply because it has Sid's name on it. |
Yup, instead you're blindly disbelieving in a game just because it has Sid's name on it. I was (and still am) every bit as critical of Civ3 as you were, if not more so, I just didn't bash people over the head with that over and over and over and over... I've been very sceptical of Civ4 since the start as well, but frankly there's not much to be sceptical about. Contrary to Civ3, we've so far by and large only heard good things about Civ4. The only real concern one could have right now is what the pushed up release date will do to the overall polish, but they've been polishing this game for 2 months already and the date is only pushed up a week or two, so personally I'm fairly confident there.
People like CyberShy who blindly have faith that Civ4 will kick ass no matter what are not to be taken seriously, but neither are people like you who blindly believe the game will suck. IMO neither type of person provides any kind of useful role to the community, the constant repetition of the same old arguments over and over again (from both sides) is just cluttering the forums.
IMO the most useful contributions at this point are coming from people posting links to new articles and previews and stuff, people like Geomodder, Platypus Rex and hordes of Settlers. They provide the facts and let others form their own opions. If anyone in this forum deserves a reward (which is what I would regard a free copy of Civ4), it's people like them 
But if there's one thing I agree with, it's that this all shouldn't be taken too seriously, in the end it's just a game...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yin26
|
 |
This space reserved for Darkstar.
Apr 1999 time: 14:37
|
|
I agree with Locutus as well, which is why if anybody cares to, you'll see I've limited my critical postings to a few threads over the past few years. And the thrust of my argument, again, has never been: "Civ4 sucks because Sid made it." No, it's been, based on what we've been told, I think (yes, opinion) that we have Civ 2.7 on our hands. Sure I'm disappointed, but many gamers said "You know what, I like the familiarity of it. It feels like home." Great! Does nothing for me, of course, and I don't mind starting a thread or two about it.
In the end, though, it's a forum. If you don't like the give and take, the extremes from one side or the other, start a $1.99/min. chat line and call yourself.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
CanuckSoldier
|
 |
Wainwright AB
Nov 2002 time: 22:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by yin26
I agree with Locutus as well, which is why if anybody cares to, you'll see I've limited my critical postings to a few threads over the past few years. And the thrust of my argument, again, has never been: "Civ4 sucks because Sid made it." No, it's been, based on what we've been told, I think (yes, opinion) that we have Civ 2.7 on our hands. Sure I'm disappointed, but many gamers said "You know what, I like the familiarity of it. It feels like home." Great! Does nothing for me, of course, and I don't mind starting a thread or two about it.
In the end, though, it's a forum. If you don't like the give and take, the extremes from one side or the other, start a $1.99/min. chat line and call yourself. |
I find your opinion that this will just be Civ 2.7 ironic at the very least, as the majority complaint from a vocal minority of the MP community is that CIV is NOT just a bug free updated version of there beloved C3C, intact with all of there time proven strategies :-/ It seems that not matter what Firaxis does there will be people that complain :-?
CS
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
yin26
|
 |
This space reserved for Darkstar.
Apr 1999 time: 14:37
|
|
quote: I find your opinion that this will just be Civ 2.7 ironic at the very least, as the majority complaint from a vocal minority of the MP community is that CIV is NOT just a bug free updated version of there beloved C3C, intact with all of there time proven strategies :-/ It seems that not matter what Firaxis does there will be people that complain :-? |
I do agree that people will complain no matter what. I don't think, though, that making people have to play at least a *little* differently makes this a full version step. O.K. Maybe Civ 2.8. 
quote: Yin26 is merely the 'yin' of the yin-yang world of computer game reviews, and as such, is needed to achieve TRUE balance and harmony. |
FINALLY! Truth and understanding! 
Certainly when I read reviews, I start with the 4 or 5 out of 10 stars. Most of the time the complaints are totally useless ("It broke my monitor!"), but sometimes there are tell-tale signs that I don't even need to bother reading the positive ratings ("On hard level, all I did was build city after city after city with two spearman in each town --no other military-- and within a few hours every other civ started gifting me gold not to attack them.").
The same for the 9 or 10 out of 10 star reviews. A lot of that is useless, too ("I haven't even opened the box yet but can tell you this is best game ever!"), though sometimes revealing in a positive sense ("I used to beat Deity routinely. I just lost --badly-- on Monarch...and I've been playing non-stop for a week.").
Then, I suppose, law of averages dictates that more often than not it will be the 7 - 8 star ratings that show the best balance: "I can beat Monarch without much trouble, but the process is an egaging one, and there are usually moments of real decision making." So when I predict that we will have Civ 2.7, I imagine it would deserve a 7 or maybe (by the expansion) an 8 or even 9.
And if this still sounds too critical to people, suck it up!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|