 |
|
|
I haven't tried any multiplayer action yet and would like to get a PBEM game going. Anyone else interested?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
OK Darius. I'm not too familliar with Xfire yet, so i was thinking of SMACv4 with standard rules. Xfire or a few rule tweaks wouldn't be a big deal for me though.
What's a good number of starting players? 4?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
OK Darius. I'm not too familliar with Xfire yet, so i was thinking of SMACv4 with standard rules. Xfire or a few rule tweaks wouldn't be a big deal for me though.
What's a good number of players to start with? 4?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Nigel
|
|
Wainscotting, England
Aug 2000 time: 05:13
|
|
Sounds like a plan. Shall we start divying up factions? I'm partial to the Hive.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
stuntman19
|
|
Wa, usa
Aug 2000 time: 05:13
|
|
Nigel:
I would be interested in getting in your game if you still have room for another. My only experience with MP is hotseat games with friends in my area. I've never set up a PBEM game, but have smac or smacx so either is cool. I'm flexible on my faction you can both choose first if you like, just let me know whats taken. Anyway I'll check back and see if I'm going to be in or not.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
stuntman19
|
|
Wa, usa
Aug 2000 time: 05:13
|
|
I would take the Peacekeepers of the remaining smac factions. My e-mail is stunt_man_19@yahoo.com. Whatever the group decides for settings is n\p for me. Look forward to getting started .
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Nigel
|
|
Wainscotting, England
Aug 2000 time: 05:13
|
|
Does average environmental settings mean a random, standard-size planet? I usually prefer BIG planets, but I suppose PBEM takes long enough as it is, no?
I guess we're ready to go. Do we select an emcee to collect passwords and generate the game?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Nigel
|
|
Wainscotting, England
Aug 2000 time: 05:13
|
|
2101 sent to Simpson II.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Nigel
|
|
Wainscotting, England
Aug 2000 time: 05:13
|
|
Say, i was just trying to figure out the MP diplomacy system. It looks like we start with all the other player's frequencies. Why is this? Should we say no in-context communication until first contact?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
stuntman19
|
|
Wa, usa
Aug 2000 time: 05:13
|
|
Nigel:
It is the same in hotseat for some reason. I would vote for no communications until first contact- more realistic. Communications can take several turns, and work a little different but its cool though.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
stuntman19
|
|
Wa, usa
Aug 2000 time: 05:13
|
|
Dnss2102 on to Lord Darius
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Nigel
|
|
Wainscotting, England
Aug 2000 time: 05:13
|
|
DNSS2102 sent to S II
Another question:
Are preference changes specific to the game or the PC?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
stuntman19
|
|
Wa, usa
Aug 2000 time: 05:13
|
|
Dnss2103 to Lord Darius
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Nigel
|
|
Wainscotting, England
Aug 2000 time: 05:13
|
|
DNSS2103 to Prov S II
|
|
|  |
 |
|
stuntman19
|
|
Wa, usa
Aug 2000 time: 05:13
|
|
Dnss-2104 to Lord Darius
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Nigel
|
|
Wainscotting, England
Aug 2000 time: 05:13
|
|
DNSS2104 to Prov Simpson
The first time i took my turn, all my units had 'already moved' status at last turn's positions. I restarted the turn so i guess there'll be a tampering message. Anyone run into this before?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
stuntman19
|
|
Wa, usa
Aug 2000 time: 05:13
|
|
I received the save file from my previous turn from Simpson II, so I receive a tamporing notice right off. I have double checked it as I have no other zip or save files on my system. So I backed out of the enter screen and have e-mailed Simpson II to send me the most recent file. Will play my turn as soon as I receive the correct file.
Later
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13. Apolyton Time is 00:13. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|