 |
|
|
if dino is supposed to end in the begining of civ3, what exactly happens??????
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vanguard
|
|
Monster Island
Apr 1999 time: 05:14
|
|
Yeah, I mean suppose you do really good as the dinosaurs. Will Civ3 then be about dinosaur civilisation?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
I personally think if a Dino pack survives, (you win the game) then Civ3, never happens. If the dinos die, then it allows the mammals to start forming civs.
It's probably not the way they'll have it setup, but I think it's more logical.
[This message has been edited by Sophanthro (edited December 17, 1999).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The Joker
|
|
Copenhagen, Denmark
Aug 1999 time: 06:14
|
|
I agree that this develpoement is pretty odd.
Since I first read the "Something is evolving at Firaxis" note i had hoped that the game would be about evolution, so you would start out as some microbe and if you won you'd get an advanced civilization that dominated the earth. I never thougth the game would be restricted to dinosaurs.
Well, guess you can't get it all.
That dinogame is probably gonna be good anyway!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
My Hopes were along the same lines as The Joker.
Did anyway play that Civ-life scenario BTW.
It really helped me with my Biology. Tee Hee, so Civ *is* educational.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
wheathin
|
|
Maybe if you win with the dinosaurs, you get your evolved butts off the planet to let the runty mammals have a shot?
Wheathin
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vanguard
|
|
Monster Island
Apr 1999 time: 05:14
|
|
Maybe the aliens in Smax are evolved dinos.
Or maybe evolved winos.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
The diplomat
|
 |
Terre Haute, IN USA
Sep 1999 time: 23:14
|
|
I find the dino-Progenitor connection really intriguing. I think it could be the missing link...
I have another possibility: if the asteroid missed, then maybe dinosaurs coexisted with the human ancestors. Each major group of animal is the equivalent of a "civ". All the dinosaurs are one "civ", all the flying creatures are a "civ", all the sea creatures are another "civ", and the pre-humans would be another "civ". You could play any "civ", but as a prequel to civ3, the player would control the pre-human "civ", with two possible victory conditions: conquest, where you must hunt the dinosaurs to extinction to become the dominant species, or an evolution victory where you must evolve into modern Man. Either way, it really fits nicely with the beginning od civ3. Humans are the dominant species, no dinosaurs, everything is set to start building a civilization.
What do say?
------------------
No permanent enemies, no permanent friends.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
The Joker
|
|
Copenhagen, Denmark
Aug 1999 time: 06:14
|
|
I like the idea of having the game start with the asteroid 65 million years ago. This way the earth will be more or less empty, as 80 % of all life has been eliminated. It would be a new start, with no strong species. You would then pick a species (a dinospecies, some rat, birds etc) and head for intelligence. You would lead evolution, guiding whether to be a carnivor or a planteater, but you couldn't just expand like crazy, as that would destroy all food and so destroy yourself. So making yourself into a viscious carnivor wouldn't neccesarily be good as you would kill all prey.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
croxis
|
|
Edge of nowhere
Jan 1970 time: 05:14
|
|
this isn't as exciting, but the contenents will most likely move in SMD and help create the map to play on in CivIII?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:14. Apolyton Time is 00:14. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|