 |
|
|
aargh, not another "Age of" game! please! 
the diaries are great, but it would also be great to know some of the things that are certain. so far all we've been presented with are the choices(with some implications, that is true)...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
on the other hand, we are far away from release so in order to have something to keep people interested all this time(there have been three diaries in less than a month after all)...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
classically, dear yin, it's the "age of" games that copy ideas from civ, not vice versa...
let's keep the tradition
[This message has been edited by MarkG (edited January 16, 2000).]
|
|
| |
|
|
RenderDrone
|
|
Nice one Yin. Way to shrug it off. Roll with the punches. The dream of becoming a beta tester is getting closer. Although, I think you've cried wolf too many times in the past....
|
|
| |
|
|
|
yin26
|
 |
This space reserved for Darkstar.
Apr 1999
time: 14:14
|
|
Markos,
True enough. I'll admit that after all this RTS I've been doing, a really well done TBS would be a great thing. But I would miss the multiplayer terribly.
Bossman and RenderDrone:
Many people, including you two, have pretended to understand my stance on Firaxis for a long time. But you've misunderstood it all the while. I don't care to rehash the past, so that's all I have to say.
As for being a beta tester, I don't have the time or the patience. Plus, I'm not qualified. I have no experience. And, to tell you the truth, I've had my share of playing buggy ("finished") games, so why would I want to play a buggy unfinished one? In fact, I won't be buying any games until at least the first round of patches come out and I can see the situation. I'm sure Dinos will be the same with me, though I think the open beta idea might well catch a lot of problems that (IMO) detracted from SMAC.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RenderDrone
|
|
nice save. no wonder they coined the terms "bullshit" and "artist" together.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Yeah, they're nice... I just wish they would be a bit more specific! I mean, they are just re-asking our questions rather than answering them, and leaving us hunting for scraps of subtle suggestions.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
yes, yin, you're right yin about aok. i tried the demo, 3 hours passed like 1 minute! it was great, I was amazed byt the whole presentation, the tutorial, etc. 5 minutes later I realized that all I was doing to win was sending hordes of units agains other hordes of units, eventually winning. this wasnt strategy, it was a speed race
|
|
| |
|
|
|
would I be extreme if I said that(perhaps a bit depending from the players) ANY game is great in multiplayer??
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Vanguard
|
|
Monster Island
Apr 1999
time: 05:14
|
|
Any game? How about SMAC?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
yin26
|
|
This space reserved for Darkstar.
Apr 1999
time: 14:14
|
|
Markos,
Vanguard is right. A TBS game, even a good one, just doesn't translate well to mulitplayer. Have you ever tried a PBEM game of SMAC? Heck, even the LAN games run to 5, 6, 7 + hours. Most of the people who talk about MP SMAC say, "Well, we played for 6 hours and had fun, but we never finished the game."
Hmmm. I would think actually finishing a game is pretty important.
Now people point to chess as a TBS game with "good" MP. I suppose so, but the mechanics of the game are infinitely easy compared to SMAC, for example. So a person can actually finish a MP game of chess in a reasonable amount of time.
On the flip side, even a lot of RTS games suck in multiplayer because they weren't geared towards it. AoK is GREAT in MP because they had that in mind from day one. Not only that, the SP campaigns and the comp play (for a while) are quite excellent. Of course, the Zone has problems, but that's not the fault of ES. Anyway, IP games are VERY easy to start.
So even in Dinos is a great SP game, if it has limited or no MP, it will fade away much sooner than it has to. Even Sid has recently said that MP is exciting!
[This message has been edited by yin26 (edited January 17, 2000).]
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
NoviceCEO
|
 |
Criciúma, SC, Brazil
Oct 1999
time: 02:14
|
|
Oh yes.
AoK is great multiplayer. If Mark think it's just hordes versus horders I can say Civ is just hordes versus hordes too.
Anyway, Starcraft is much better than AoK in multiplayer. It runs much better, gets better latency, Battle.net kicks The zone in the head and SC has much more varieties than AoK, thanks to its great scenario editor.
But enough of this. Why don't we get back to the topic:the diaries.
Not only because it help us learn something about the game neither because they give us a view back the scenes, but because they make me feel sure they're considering the options, that means I feel safer they're taking the best decisions.
In the diaries, Sid's shown he's got a good vision of what the should be, and what are the differences between his possible choices. That makes things easier for him to take the correct decisions.
novice
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Glak.
|
|
yin26:
"A TBS game, even a good one, just doesn't translate well to mulitplayer"
Well I hope that isn't a universal thing, I'm trying to make a multiplayer only TBS (with a high level of detail) and I'm hoping it will work out. I'm also hoping blizzard won't sue me when I make my game work unofficially on battle.net (hee hee)
"Have you ever tried a PBEM game of SMAC? Heck, even the LAN games run to 5, 6, 7 + hours."
I tried a PBEM with three friends. We averaged at least ten turns a week for months. We also have maybe four hotseat sessions (of the PBEM game) that lasted around 8 hours each. So that is like six months of PBEM with 30 hours of hotseat play, all on a single game. We go nowhere.
"Of course, the Zone has problems, but that's not the fault of ES."
yeah it must be horrible to be stuck with that thing. The trouble is they can't leave MS because MS owns the AoE property.
Imran Siddiqui:
"Well, I think these are the questions Firaxis is asking themselves as well. I don't believe that they know what kind of game they will turn out with."
Has Sid ever been the main guy behind a sequel to any of his games? Brian took over the Civ series and some other people are doing that Antitem game and I don't know anything about those other games. What I am trying to say is Sid doesn't seem to like to do the same thing twice. I don't think this game is going to be like any traditional TBS or RTS at all. After dinos he'll probably design some turn based first person shooter.
MarkG:
"It's in single player where the game shows if it it(the game itself, not the enjoyment of competing with another human) can keep you in front of the computer for hours"
for you, and probably a few million other people. Not everyone is that way though. Sure I can play single player for maybe up to a hundred hours if the game has a great storyline but without that, then maybe ten. To play a thousand hours or more I need multiplayer and there are millions of others that need multiplayer too. I want to be able to log onto a two year old game and see that 50,000+ people are always online no matter what the hour, and then go to some of the old rooms and get a game with people I used to know, or perhaps I could drop by www.battlereports.com and read well written stories often illustrated with screenshots of key parts of the game. I think you are depriving yourself of enjoyment by ignoring multiplayer gaming. It isn't competitive either, the atmosphere is often quite friendly and receptive to new folks.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Glak. on 01-19-2000 09:39 PMI want to be able to log onto a two year old game and see that 50,000+ people are always online no matter what the hour, and then go to some of the old rooms and get a game with people I used to know, or perhaps I could drop by www.battlereports.com and read well written stories often illustrated with screenshots of key parts of the game. |
you're talking about things that either exist in the "single player"(and of course the "multiplayer") forums as well as the various sections of our site and other sites. you're talking about an oline community. this has nothing to do with the game being single player or multiplayer
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Glak.
|
|
MarkG
"you're talking about things that either exist in the "single player"(and of course the "multiplayer") forums as well as the various sections of our site and other sites. you're talking about an oline community. this has nothing to do with the game being single player or multiplayer "
well sort of, but I don't think it is the same. Discussing strategy at say, shock's forum is different than discussing strategy here, because you play with and against the people you talk to. Yeah there is an online community for single player games but I think the experience is more so multiplayer.
Adm.Naismith
"you are dreaming of a world"
no actually I was describing quite clearly how battle.net is, such a place exists. SC has been out for two years now and its peak in popularity was this fall. Only lately has the bnet population starting dropping to 40K users, of course it is much higher during peak hours. I have seen 80K personally and I assume it has been much higher. The week after the mac release (plus all the PC players were playing) a record of something like 2.2 million games were played in 24 hours.
Oh actually I just saw an update, I was way off, here is a quote from blizz: "Total games over Battle.net reached 11,379,766 -- the first time more than 10 million Blizzard games have been played in the same day. The record for concurrent users was also broken with a peak of 106,608 users online at the same time"
"1) no connection (or low and fix) cost or a lot of money to throw away - neither common here in Europe"
yes you are correct, very few European players play and most of them that do play from dorms or internet cafes. However in America and Canada and probably some other countries access is cheap.
In Korea Starcraft is shockingly popular. It has almost taken over the culture. Its popularity has caused 10,000 PC game rooms (each with a large number of computers) to spring up, primarily dedicated to SC. These places run 24 hours a day and cost like a dollar an hour to use. Well this is kind of off topic but I think it is really strange. There are legal battles over using SC characters in commercials for soap and stuff, really strange. There are dozens of professional gamers that wander around Seoul and make their living from SC tournaments, some parents (according to the Korean Herald) have brought their children to game rooms asking the opperators to make them professional gamers. An american, 2 canadians and a swede have moved to korea to live the tournament life. Well I kind of thought that was strange that Korean SC players outnumber americans by 9.5 to 1 last time blizzard mentioned it.
"2) way too much spare time to put out of real life."
Everyone at every moment is doing exactly whatever he thinks is the best possible use of his time. Some people like video games more than others.
"Play with other human is fine, but IMHO it's better don't forget how often game developers push multiplayer as a shortcut to achieve cheap (by players themselves) brain instead of expensive and difficult to program good AI single player opponent."
I think I'd still take the human experience over fighting the AI. Well actually on bnet since most players are worse than the updated AI they like to play two or three humans players allied against the AI. So you get to play against the AI and cooperate with other humans.
[This message has been edited by Glak. (edited January 20, 2000).]
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:14.
Apolyton Time is 00:14. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
16-01-2000 20:11
.
|